<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-02-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2575" />
  <endPage num="2642" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Parliamentary Committees</name>
    <text id="20110223886c4b709fdf4cdd80000011">
      <heading>Parliamentary Committees</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Works Committee: Port Bonython Jetty Refurbishment</name>
      <text id="20110223886c4b709fdf4cdd80000012">
        <heading>PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE: PORT BONYTHON JETTY REFURBISHMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4336" kind="speech">
        <name>Mrs VLAHOS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Taylor</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-02-23T11:05:00" />
        <text id="20110223886c4b709fdf4cdd80000013">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-23T11:05:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4336">Mrs VLAHOS (Taylor) (11:05):</by>  I move:</text>
        <text id="20110223886c4b709fdf4cdd80000014">
          <inserted>That the 388<sup>th</sup> report of the committee, on the Port Bonython jetty refurbishment, be noted.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Finniss</electorate>
        <startTime time="2011-02-23T11:06:00" />
        <text id="20110223886c4b709fdf4cdd80000015">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-23T11:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY (Finniss) (11:06):</by>  Quite clearly this was a matter of major importance for the South Australian economy, and the opposition had no hesitation whatsoever in supporting the project. It was a significantly expensive project—from memory, around about $40 million—for what appeared to be not a great deal of work, which was the worry as far as I was concerned. I know that opposition members asked a number of questions about it. It is of major strategic importance for the Upper Spencer Gulf and, as I said, major economic importance to the state.</text>
        <text id="20110223886c4b709fdf4cdd80000016">One of the things that came out in relation to this was where exactly we are with refurbishment and upgrades on other jetties around the state that are owned by the state. We are yet to find out a bit more, but my information on the Port Bonython Jetty refurbishment was that this is more the start of things up there rather than the end of things. It is heavily used; the figures that were produced at the time were quite amazing. I know that the department was asked to come back with some further information which it did but, in brief, there was absolutely no opposition from the opposition. In fact, it was a very worthwhile exercise going through that process and I know, Madam Speaker, that you have an intense interest in it. We support the project.</text>
        <text id="20110223886c4b709fdf4cdd80000017">Motion carried.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>