<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-02-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2427" />
  <endPage num="2504" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Hospital Emergency Departments</name>
      <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000858">
        <heading>HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-10">
            <name>HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-10T15:13:00" />
        <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000859">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-10T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (15:13):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Why is the South Australian Labor government retaining a discredited arbitrary target for emergency department waiting times when Prime Minister Gillard has announced the dumping by federal Labor of the four-hour targets in emergency departments; and will the promise of $100 million announced by Premier Rann to enable emergency departments to achieve the four-hour targets still be available to reduce waiting times?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-10">
            <name>HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-10T15:13:00" />
        <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000860">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-10T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (15:13):</by>  I was hoping for this question from the shadow minister. He is always predictable in terms of his questions. The first point he made that it is a discredited policy is not true; it is not a discredited policy. It is a very sound policy which the Liberal government in Western Australia has adopted, and the government in Britain has continued. It now has a 95 per cent—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="interjection">
        <name>Dr McFetridge</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000861">
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFetridge:</by>  They're not; it's not true.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000862">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  The government in Britain has a 95 per cent target that has been put in place, as I understand it, and now the commonwealth—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3115" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Fox</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000863">
          <by role="member" id="3115">Ms Fox:</by>  It's from <term>The Daily Mail</term>, it's fiction.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000864">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  From <term>The Daily Mail</term>, that's right. The government of Australia has got the same policy The member has made the claim that the Prime Minister has dumped the policy. I would ask the member to provide proof to the house that the Gillard government has dropped this policy. A piece of paper that the member holds up in front of him does not seem to me to be demonstrable proof. The member is relying—</text>
        <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000865">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000866">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201102100f6d74df7ed94610a0000867">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  —on <term>The Advertiser</term>. I say to my good friends at <term>The Advertiser</term> that I know they very rarely get it wrong, but I say to the member for Morphett that I would not be relying on that report for my information about what the Gillard government is or is not going to do in relation to the emergency target. Our government has a commitment to that target, whatever anybody else does, and we will resource it appropriately, as we have already announced.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>