<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2011-02-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2427" />
  <endPage num="2504" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Leave Entitlements</name>
      <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000791">
        <heading>PUBLIC SECTOR LEAVE ENTITLEMENTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-02-10">
            <name>PUBLIC SECTOR LEAVE ENTITLEMENTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2011-02-10T15:00:00" />
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000792">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-10T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (15:00):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Is the failure of minister Weatherill to inform and alert the cabinet of massive financial implications of the policy to allow public servants to cash out their long—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000793">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000794">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The Minister for Transport, point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000795">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  The question cannot contain comment. Referring to massive whatever it was is plain comment. She cannot expect the Premier not to debate an answer if she debates the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000796">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  Madam Speaker, I will reword it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000797">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Yes; I was just going to ask you to reword the question, because I do uphold that point of order. It was very judgemental.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000798">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  Is the failure of minister Weatherill to inform and alert cabinet of the financial implications told by Treasury to be potentially at only 10 per cent take-up, at least $130 million—</text>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000799">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000800">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000801">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  Is the failure by minister Weatherill to inform and alert the cabinet of that, that is, the policy about the long service leave implications, the cashing out—</text>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000802">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000803">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000804">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  —and the potential financial implications—is the failure of minister Weatherill to alert the cabinet of that the reason he has chosen to endorse minister Rau? Is that the reason—</text>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000805">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000806">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000807">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND:</by>  I think he's got the gist of it, Madam Speaker, if I can just finish the sentence; that is, is that the reason he has chosen to endorse minister Rau as his potential successor instead of minister Weatherill?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2011-02-10T15:02:00" />
        <page num="2472" />
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000808">
          <timeStamp time="2011-02-10T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (15:02):</by>  Can I just say that I heard this kind of rambling rumbling. I know that some lawyers take silk, others wear silk, but it seemed to me that it was not exactly a Rumpole-like performance. So the answer is: the former treasurer has just told you that these issues were resolved a year ago. I have the utmost confidence in the Minister for Education. So, I would suggest to the Leader of the Opposition, given her performances in court and here in this house, that she sticks to pantomime, sticks to waving around a wand with my photo on it, as the Queen of Hearts.</text>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000809">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000810">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000811">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000812">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I warn the member for Unley!</text>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000813">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000814">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Members on my right, also.</text>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000815">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="14">The Hon. K.O. Foley interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000816">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> The Minister for Police will be quiet.</text>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000817">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2011021084e7125301eb4e6280000818">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Member for Unley, do you want to take a walk for three days? Because that's what you're due. Member for Torrens.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>