<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-11-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2221" />
  <endPage num="2289" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Criminal Law (Sentencing) (Sentencing Powers of Magistrates Court) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001036">
        <heading>CRIMINAL LAW (SENTENCING) (SENTENCING POWERS OF MAGISTRATES COURT) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001037">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001038">Second Reading.</text>
        <talker role="member" id="627" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Employment, Training and Further Education</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Science and Information Economy</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2010-11-25T16:53:00" />
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001039">
            <timeStamp time="2010-11-25T16:53:00" />
            <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Employment, Training and Further Education, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (16:53): </by> I move:</text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001040">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001041">I seek leave to have the second reading explanation inserted in <term>Hansard </term>without my reading it.</text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001042">Leave granted.</text>
          <page num="2286" />
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001043">
            <inserted>In 2006, the Rann Labor Government introduced legislative reforms that increased the penalty levels for breaches of the <term>Occupational Health Safety and Welfare Act 1986</term>. These amendments came into force on 1 January 2008. They reflected recommendations of the SafeWork SA Advisory Committee, made after a broad review of occupational health, safety and welfare penalties, which involved representatives of employers, workers and the Government.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001044">
            <inserted>Today I introduce into this house a Bill that supplements and is consequential to the 2008 reforms and that ensures the efficient administration of occupational health, safety and welfare matters in the South Australian court system.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001045">
            <inserted>The key changes proposed in this bill are:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001046">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>it allows Industrial Magistrates to impose penalties of up to $300,000 when hearing criminal offences under the <term>Occupational Health, Safety and Welfare Act</term>.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001047">
            <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
              <inserted>it ensures that Industrial Magistrates have the capacity to impose up to $300,000 fines for offences committed after the penalty increases in 2008 but before the passing of this Bill.</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001048">
            <inserted>These are important administrative and procedural changes that supplement the 2008 increases to penalty levels in the <term>Occupational Health Safety and Welfare Act</term>.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001049">
            <inserted>Under the penalty regime that became effective in 2008, Division 1 corporate offences have a maximum penalty of $600,000 and Division 2 corporate offences have a maximum penalty of $300,000.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001050">
            <inserted>The vast majority of convictions under the <term>Occupational Health, Safety and Welfare Act</term> are Division 2 corporate offences attracting a maximum penalty of $300,000.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001051">
            <inserted>For a number of years, Industrial Magistrates have heard the majority of occupational health, safety and welfare cases in South Australia. During this time, they have developed the skill and experience required to deal with these matters. The current sentencing limit for Industrial Magistrates is $150,000.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001052">
            <inserted>With the introduction of this Bill, Industrial Magistrates will be able to hear and sentence in relation to all Division 2 offences, providing consistency for the Court system as well as for employers and employees.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001053">
            <inserted>It should be recognised that the penalties only apply when there has been a criminal conviction where a corporation has failed to provide a safe working environment for employees and other persons engaged at the workplace.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001054">
            <inserted>If the sentencing capacity of Industrial Magistrates is not increased, OHS matters that might attract a potential fine over $150,000 would need to be conducted in the District Court.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001055">
            <inserted>The District Court already has a large number of cases to deal with. Prosecuting occupational health, safety and welfare cases in the District Court would be considerably more time consuming for all parties concerned. If any party disputes the decision of an Industrial Magistrate, the option to initiate an appeal to a higher court remains available.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001056">
            <inserted>The Bill that I am introducing today will provide consistency and significant case management advantages for the South Australian court system into the future.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001057">
            <inserted>The proposed amendments to the <term>Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988</term> were released for public comment on 24 December 2008 and in the period up to 13 March 2009, 35 submissions were received from Employer Organisations, Trade Union Organisations and Individuals.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001058">
            <inserted>The Government recognises the important contribution made by all organisations and individuals who engaged in the consultative process. The collaborative approach is testimony to the capacity of all stakeholders and demonstrates that a co-operative approach is the best way to achieve fair and effective change to occupational health, safety and welfare legislation.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001059">
            <inserted>This Bill plays an important role in ensuring the effective administration of occupational health, safety and welfare legislation. It delivers consistency to the administration of occupational health, safety and welfare offences and provides flexibility for the courts as we move to a national system of work health safety legislation.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001060">
            <inserted>I commend the Bill to Members.</inserted>
          </text>
          <bookmark>Explanation of Clauses</bookmark>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001061">
            <inserted>
              <subheading>Explanation of Clauses</subheading>
            </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001062">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 1—Preliminary</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001063">
            <item>
              <inserted>1—Short title</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001064">
            <item>
              <inserted>2—Commencement</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001065">
            <item>
              <inserted>3—Amendment provisions</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001066">
            <inserted>These clauses are formal.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001067">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 2—Amendment of <term>Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act 1988</term></inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001068">
            <item>
              <inserted>4—Amendment of section 19—Limitations on sentencing powers of Magistrates Court</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001069">
            <inserted>This clause increases the maximum fine that an industrial magistrate can impose for an offence under the <term>Occupational Health, Safety and Welfare Act 1986</term> from $150,000 to $300,000.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20101125ce2d400582354b3d90001070">Debate adjourned on motion of Mr Williams.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>