<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-11-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2063" />
  <endPage num="2130" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Statutes Amendment and Repeal (Australian Consumer Law) Bill</name>
      <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000228">
        <heading>STATUTES AMENDMENT AND REPEAL (AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER LAW) BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000229">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000230">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000231">(Continued from 10 November 2010.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="speech">
          <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
          <startTime time="2010-11-23T12:56:00" />
          <page num="2083" />
          <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000232">
            <timeStamp time="2010-11-23T12:56:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (12:56):</by>  I rise to speak on the Statutes Amendment and Repeal (Australian Consumer Law) Bill 2010. This legislation essentially amends the Fair Trading Act 1987 and provides for Australian Consumer Law (which is a commonwealth law) to be part of the law of South Australia. I will have something to say about the model that is being used in this instance (relative to what may be appropriate) and what other options would better suit. However, I do note that this is a national law that is going to be introduced into our system of law, as distinct from models that have otherwise been used.</text>
          <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000233">The commonwealth's Australian Consumer Law was enacted through the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) bills No. 1 and No. 2 2010. This bill makes provision for the application of the ACL as law in South Australia into our relevant legislation and, in particular, the Fair Trading Act 1987, as I have said.</text>
          <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000234">The origins of this venture, culminating in this legislation in South Australia, were initially precipitated by an inquiry which had been commissioned by the former treasurer, the Hon. Peter Costello. One has to only regret the fact that he is not still in the job running our federal finances, but nevertheless, in this instance, he commissioned a Productivity Commission inquiry (which was undertaken in 2007-08) into Australia's consumer protection framework. Again to put this in context, it had been agreed as a result of a ministerial council on consumer affairs in August 2008 and subsequently by the Council of Australian Governments in October 2008.</text>
          <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000235">The rationale is that nationally consistent Australian consumer law would offer business a more conducive environment in which to operate and also to provide a simpler process for the rights of consumers to be both protected and explored. I seek leave to conclude my remarks later.</text>
          <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000236">Leave granted; debate adjourned.</text>
          <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000237" />
          <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000238">
            <event>[Sitting suspended from 13:00 to 14:00]</event>
          </text>
          <text id="201011237886685778b84cff80000239" />
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>