<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-11-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2063" />
  <endPage num="2130" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>TAFE SA</name>
      <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000652">
        <heading>TAFE SA</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-11-23">
            <name>TAFE SA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-11-23T14:58:00" />
        <page num="2100" />
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000653">
          <timeStamp time="2010-11-23T14:58:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (14:58):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Employment, Training and Further Education. Does the minister concede that the $33.5 million spent by the government so far on the International University Precinct initiatives could be better spent on capping TAFE fees so that South Australian TAFE students do not pay the highest fees in the nation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000654">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Point of order, Madam Speaker.</text>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000655">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000656">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000657">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  What was couched as question is plainly argument and contrary to standing orders.</text>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000658">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000659">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000660">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  'Do you concede that it would be spent better?' That is an argument. The member for Unley may not be the most sophisticated bloke in the world, but we are here to help you. It is argument.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000661">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Yes, I do uphold that. I was about to pull you up anyway, member for Unley, on that question. You need to be very careful about the wording of your question. I am going to waive that question and we will go on to the next question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pisoni</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000662">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni:</by>  Can I reword it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201011237513a000ba9d4eeb80000663">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> If you can reword it, you can ask the next question.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>