<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-10-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1701" />
  <endPage num="1816" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000693">
      <heading>Grievance Debate</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Health Budget</name>
      <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000694">
        <heading>HEALTH BUDGET</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2010-10-27T15:28:00" />
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000695">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-27T15:28:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:28):</by>  There was an interesting performance by the Minister for Education today. Apparently in a press conference just before question time he was asked whether he backs the current leadership team of the government, the Premier and Deputy Premier, and he answered, 'Caucus has made a decision and I have to respect that decision.' That was a rousing endorsement.</text>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000696">I bring this to the attention of the house because we have a government in distress, and this is possibly one of the reasons why we have a government making dumb decisions. The minister today avoided going out to see the reaction from the communities which he seeks to destroy by withdrawing a paltry sum of money, yet the reality is that his health budget is going to suffer from the dumb decisions that he has been making. I will come to that in a moment.</text>
        <page num="1742" />
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000697">It also came to my attention that our Premier (the twitterer) twittered recently that he actually had a meal in Keith. Returning from Penola on the 17<sup>th</sup><sup></sup>after the canonisation of St Mary, the Premier apparently stopped in Keith to have a steak sandwich and chips, and he twittered that he was there so the world would know that he was in Keith. This is the Premier who, after the election that he lost, said, 'My ministers need to reconnect with the people. I've instructed that they go out and doorknock.'</text>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000698">This is the Premier who stopped in Keith to have a meal but who did not have the courtesy to ring up the chair of the local hospital board and say, 'I've got something for you. I'm in your town today. I understand that you guys are stressing over what my government is doing to your local hospital. Can I have 10 minutes of your time?' That is what the Premier would have done if he knew anything about connecting with the communities in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000699">This is the Premier who stands up and makes believe that he is governing for the whole of South Australia. The Minister for Health is disingenuous when he says, 'We are increasing the amount of money we are putting into country health.' He is disingenuous because, for eight years in a row, in real terms he has cut the amount of money that has gone into country health. Country hospitals are suffering right across the board.</text>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000700">He is also disingenuous when he says, 'We are providing for three public hospital beds in the Keith Hospital, but we are only getting a part of that service back because, on average, we have only one bed occupied.' What the minister does not tell the people of South Australia when he is making those statements is that, on average, 5½ beds at the Keith Hospital are occupied. The fact is that most of those people pay for those beds through their private health insurance.</text>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000701">It is disingenuous of the minister not to acknowledge that, if that hospital closes, every one of those patients will end up in the public health system—every one of them. In the budget that this government handed down a few weeks ago (months late), one of the minister's performance targets for country health is to drive the rate of private patients in country hospitals to 16 per cent.</text>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000702">The budget also shows that it dropped from 11.9 per cent to 11.3 per cent in the last 12 months. The minister's strategy of getting more private patients contributing to his health budget is not working: it is going backwards. I can tell the house that 80 per cent plus of the people who go to the Keith and District Hospital use private health. At the end of next June—and do not be mistaken by this minister—that hospital will close.</text>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000703">One of the things that the board cannot do—and will not do, obviously—is to trade insolvent. That is what will happen when the government withdraws this paltry sum. That hospital will close. There will be no accident and emergency service purchased for $300,000 because there will be no doctors in that community and there will be no hospital to service it from. It will cost a fortune to provide an accident and emergency service along the Dukes Highway and the Riddoch Highway.</text>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000704">Minister, we heard about volunteers today. Do not think that volunteers are going to man ambulances along hundreds of kilometres of that road when there is no hospital to take road trauma victims to. You are asking volunteers to go out and pick up road victims off the road with nowhere to take them. Give us a break. It is not going to happen. Every one of those people in that community—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3115">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000705">
          <by role="member" id="3115">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  Thank you, member for MacKillop.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000706">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  —will end up being your responsibility, minister, and you know it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3115">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000707">
          <by role="member" id="3115">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  Thank you, your time has expired.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000708">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> It is a great pity, Madam Deputy Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3115">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000709">
          <by role="member" id="3115">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  Your time has expired.</text>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000710">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="61">Mr Venning interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3115">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102764fa8a725e4948d190000711">
          <by role="member" id="3115">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  His time has expired. I mean, it is not as if we couldn't hear him; he was shouting. The member for Ashford.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>