<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-10-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1641" />
  <endPage num="1702" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Education Funding</name>
      <text id="20101026ab8fbc445a574aa380000627">
        <heading>EDUCATION FUNDING</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Finniss</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-26">
            <name>EDUCATION FUNDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-26T15:16:00" />
        <text id="20101026ab8fbc445a574aa380000628">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-26T15:16:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY (Finniss) (15:16): </by> My question is also to the Minister for Education—a popular fellow in some quarters. Can the minister please advise the house if funding guaranteed for schools given by the former chief executive officer of the Department of Education and Children's Services, Mr Chris Robinson, will be assured following Mr Robinson's dismissal? The governing council of Kangaroo Island Community Education has been informed by the Acting Chief Executive Officer of DECS, Mr Gino DeGennaro, that the three-year funding arrangement concluding on 30 June 2013 will not be guaranteed, despite a formal letter from the former CEO guaranteeing the funding.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Early Childhood Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-26">
            <name>EDUCATION FUNDING</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-26T15:17:00" />
        <text id="20101026ab8fbc445a574aa380000629">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-26T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Minister for Education, Minister for Early Childhood Development) (15:17): </by> I do not have any particular detail about that. I am not aware of the particular detail of that arrangement. In a general sense, I would say that, arrangements that have been entered into should be honoured, but obviously I need to consider precisely what it is that was agreed to and what the circumstances are of any changed arrangements. The departure—</text>
        <text id="20101026ab8fbc445a574aa380000630">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="44">Mr Pengilly interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20101026ab8fbc445a574aa380000631">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL: </by> I do not know the specific answer to the question. I am trying to help you as much as I can by making some general points. In a general sense, the departure of a chief executive should not disturb arrangements that are entered into by the agency. The agency has an existence that continues beyond the tenure of any one chief executive, just as it would in the case of a commitment entered into by a minister or the government. That is the general point. Whether or not the commitment was in the precise terms that you suggest is something we would have to look at carefully. I will bring back an answer to the house.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>