<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-10-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1641" />
  <endPage num="1702" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>ForestrySA</name>
      <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000485">
        <heading>FORESTRYSA</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-26">
            <name>FORESTRYSA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-26T14:53:00" />
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000486">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-26T14:53:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:53):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Forests.</text>
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000487">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="51">Mrs Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000488">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I warn the Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000489">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  Does the minister stand by his comments made last week following a forestry stakeholder meeting in the South-East, and reported in local media, regarding the sale of the state's forests? He said:</text>
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000490">
          <inserted>We've made our decision, it's the reason we've retained our AAA credit rating and that's the fact of the matter.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Northern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2010-10-26T14:54:00" />
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000491">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-26T14:54:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Northern Suburbs) (14:54):</by>  Thanks for the question. If you go back to the 2008-09 Mid-Year Budget Review, page 11, Reducing Net Debt, ForestrySA, it was stated that the government intends to explore a range of options for the up-front sale of ForestrySA harvests—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. Evans</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000492">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans:</by>  Do you stand by your promise?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="1669" />
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000493">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  Yes, I do; so that is very specific. We have that very much encapsulated in the review. Then there is a media statement from the Treasurer following that dated 19 December, in which he said, 'This is purely the up-front sale of the timber—nothing more.' That is fairly plain, isn't it? Then we go to Budget Paper 3 for this year: 'A significant improvement in net lending is forecast in 2011-12, mainly reflecting'—and I will miss out half the sentence because it refers to another asset—'and the proposed sale of ForestrySA assets'. Very, very plain: 'Proceeds from the sale of ForestrySA's harvests have not been disclosed so as to avoid prejudicing the sales process.' That is very, very plain, and that is backed up in my statement. I think my statement is flawless and basically accords with—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000494">
          <by role="member" id="619">An honourable member:</by>  Flawless?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000495">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  Yes.</text>
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000496">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010102672f41c2a0cf54aaea0000497">
          <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN:</by>  Well, it effectively is.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>