<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1563" />
  <endPage num="1642" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Disabled Parking Permits</name>
      <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000893">
        <heading>DISABLED PARKING PERMITS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="539" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. S.W. KEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ashford</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-10-14T16:09:00" />
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000894">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-14T16:09:00" />
          <by role="member" id="539">The Hon. S.W. KEY (Ashford) (16:09): </by> I rise today to talk about an issue that has been ongoing in the electorate of Ashford and, I suspect, in other electorates, with regard to how one accesses a disabled parking permit. In this particular case, a constituent, on behalf of his wife who has macular degeneration, has tried to access a disabled parking permit and been refused a number of times.</text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000895">In the most recent correspondence he has received, which is from Martin Small, Registrar of Motor Vehicles, dated 5 October, the response was that macular degeneration did not fit under the definition of 'disability'; and, basically, that 'sensory disabilities'—or 'visual impairment' as defined under the act—is not grounds for the carer (in this case the husband) to access a disabled parking permit for his wife when has to take her to different appointments and also general business that the family needs to do.</text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000896">While the Motor Vehicles Act 1959 contains a provision for anything other than physical impairment, it seems to be a very harsh interpretation of what physical impairment would be, especially when you look at other acts. I refer to the Equal Opportunity Act 1984, Part 5, section 66(a), which provides:</text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000897">
          <inserted>if he or she treats another unfavourably because of the other's disability, or a past disability or a disability that may exist in the future;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000898">Also, the interpretation of 'disability' states:</text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000899">
          <inserted>...in relation to a person, means—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000900">
          <item sublevel="2">
            <inserted>(a)&amp;#x9;total or partial loss of a person's bodily or mental functions.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000901">One of the grounds under the Equal Opportunity Act, of course, is 'the provision of goods and services'. I turn to the Disability Services Act 1993. Under section 3 of that act 'disability' is defined in relation to a person with a disability as:</text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000902">
          <inserted>(a)&amp;#x9;that is attributable to intellectual, psychiatric, cognitive, neurological,—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000903">and I must emphasise this—</text>
        <text continued="true" id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000904">
          <inserted>sensory or physical impairment, or a combination of any of those impairments; and</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000905">
          <inserted>(b)&amp;#x9;that is, or is likely to be, permanent; and</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000906">
          <inserted>(c)&amp;#x9;that results in the person having—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000907">
          <item sublevel="2">
            <inserted>(i)&amp;#x9;a reduced capacity for social interaction, communication, learning, mobility, decision making or self care.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000908">'Disability services' means:</text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000909">
          <inserted>services provided, whether wholly or partially, for persons with disabilities or their carers, and without limiting the generality of the expression, includes—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000910">and there are a whole lot of areas included, including subsection (m) which is 'transport services'. I would have thought that not only does the application for a disabled parking permit fit within the equal opportunity and the disability services legislation with regard to 'disability' but also under the Disability Services Act with respect to 'transport services'. I would have thought that a disabled parking permit fits under that particular service.</text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000911">I would like to say that I understand that the Registrar of Motor Vehicles does have a difficult time in receiving all these applications, but I really cannot see how macular degeneration could be excluded as a disability under this act; and, if that interpretation is, in fact, supported, I think there needs to be amendments.</text>
        <text id="201010142c1078c97afd40a790000912">Time expired.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>