<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-10-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1563" />
  <endPage num="1642" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
      <text id="20101014d4544bde65504e80b0000678">
        <heading>MURRAY-DARLING BASIN PLAN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-14">
            <name>MURRAY-DARLING BASIN PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-14T15:07:00" />
        <page num="1608" />
        <text id="20101014d4544bde65504e80b0000679">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-14T15:07:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:07):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Can he explain how it has occurred that the guide to the Murray-Darling Basin Plan has failed to recognise the long-standing cap on diversions in South Australia and irrigators' investment in efficient water use measures, given that the South Australian government was invited to make submissions to the authority during the plan's development?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-10-14">
            <name>MURRAY-DARLING BASIN PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-10-14T15:08:00" />
        <text id="20101014d4544bde65504e80b0000680">
          <timeStamp time="2010-10-14T15:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (15:08):</by>  I think that during the evolution of the process there has been enormous contact between the officers of the department—in fact, I am sure that the minister will be able to give more details of that—and those involved in this process, and that will be ongoing. A lot of people around the country are unhappy with the plan, but do not forget that, during the middle of the drought, when we were told at a COAG meeting by someone who had been introduced to us by John Howard—he was the head of the then authority—that we were facing a one in one thousand year low inflow, and it then got worse—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20101014d4544bde65504e80b0000681">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  I rise on a point of order. The question was: how did the key to South Australia's future get left out of the plan when this government had the opportunity to make submissions to the drafters of the plan?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20101014d4544bde65504e80b0000682">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> So, your point of order, I presume, is relevance. I think that the Premier might be getting to it, because I have been listening carefully to what is said.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20101014d4544bde65504e80b0000683">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  What I am trying to do in, perhaps, a discursive way and without the normal rhetorical interruptions from the other side, is to explain that they have considered an incredibly complex range of inputs. What we hope we will see happen is that in the final plan there will be some recognition of prior commitment.</text>
        <text id="20101014d4544bde65504e80b0000684">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20101014d4544bde65504e80b0000685">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20101014d4544bde65504e80b0000686">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  If you want to know why, perhaps you should ask the independent commission.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>