<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-09-30T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1497" />
  <endPage num="1564" />
  <dateModified time="2023-06-16T13:52:38+09:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000100">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Burnside Council</name>
      <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000101">
        <heading>BURNSIDE COUNCIL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="speech">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-09-30T11:13:00" />
        <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000102">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-30T11:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (11:13):</by>  I seek leave to make a personal explanation.</text>
        <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000103">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000104">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  I understand that the member for Light indicated to the house only minutes ago that minister Gago in some way has been impeded from publishing a report commonly known as the MacPherson report into the Burnside council as a result of that report being necessarily suppressed by court order. I rise, by way of a personal explanation, to inform the house that that is untrue.</text>
        <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000105">The correct position is this. There is an application before the Supreme Court and it relates to the validity of the process of the investigation. In the course of those proceedings, an affidavit by one of the claimants has been sealed, and attached to it as an annexure is that report, but there has been no court order or injunction, no action whatsoever by the Supreme Court or any other court to suppress the publication of this report. This is a matter that entirely rests with minister Gago, and that remains the case. I ask that the member for Light make sure that he clearly understands that before he comes into this place and makes that sort of assertion.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="538">
        <name>Mrs GERAGHTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000106">
          <by role="member" id="538">Mrs GERAGHTY:</by>  On a point of order, Madam Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000107">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Point of order, member for Torrens.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="538">
        <name>Mrs GERAGHTY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000108">
          <by role="member" id="538">Mrs GERAGHTY:</by>  I think this has gone well beyond a personal explanation. I actually think the member is giving a speech.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201009307a816a68107a4d41b0000109">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> I uphold that point of order. I was getting rather concerned. A personal explanation is about something relating to the member, and this seems to have gone well beyond that. I think we have heard sufficient from the member. The member for Fisher.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>