<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-09-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1379" />
  <endPage num="1499" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Keith and District Hospital</name>
      <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001008">
        <heading>KEITH AND DISTRICT HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-29">
            <name>KEITH AND DISTRICT HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-29T15:05:00" />
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001009">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-29T15:05:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:05): </by> My question also is to the Minister for Health. Before taking the decision to cut public funding to the Keith and District community hospital, did the minister seek and receive any advice—</text>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001010">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="9">The Hon. P.F. Conlon interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001011">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001012">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> —as to the impact upon the viability of the other services provided from that hospital? The board of the Keith and District community hospital, in addition to providing acute hospital care to private and public patients and accident emergency services, manages an 18-bed nursing home and provides GP services from Padthaway to Coonalpyn (a distance of some 140 kilometres), as well as providing essential emergency cover for a considerable length of the Dukes Highway.</text>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001013">The board has told me that the removal of any portion of this suite of services will jeopardise all the others.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001014">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> The Minister for Health, is that a specific budget question?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2010-09-29T15:06:00" />
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001015">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-29T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (15:06): </by> I cannot help but say that is yet another budget question, which raises—</text>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001016">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001017">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> I see—when they ask it is not a budget question, but when we do it is. The hypocrisy is just palpable, and it just shows the way they play politics. They want to play both sides of the street all the time, but I am happy to answer this question.</text>
        <page num="1435" />
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001018">As the member would know, because he brought to see me a delegation from the Keith hospital some time ago—it was the second delegation he has brought to me over the years—they came to see me, and he has raised this so I am happy to go through the conversation that we had.</text>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001019">They said to me, 'Our hospital will be facing closure unless you give us even more money than you're currently giving us.' I pointed out to them that we gave them money for the emergency department, which we valued and which we want to see continue, but that we were giving the money, I think, to run three beds and, in fact, the equivalent, from memory, of about 900 patients a year, and in fact they were delivering about a third of that.</text>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001020">So, they were not delivering on what we were giving them money to deliver; and in fact it was just a subsidy to their bottom line. If they could not make a go of it as a private hospital without that subsidy, that was a question really for their board. I said, 'The government is in no position to give you additional money. What you should think through is your business case. You've got a nursing home which makes money, and you've got an emergency department which is necessary and which we are prepared to subsidise. Have a think about it.'</text>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001021">They said, 'We can't do that.' I think that a representative was there from local government, and I said, 'Well, if it's so important, why doesn't the local government think about taking on some of this subsidy if it thinks it's important to its community?' They said, 'No, that's not the role of local government.' Well, I said to them, 'Subsidising country hospitals that are privately run—</text>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001022">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001023">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The deputy leader will be quiet. We have five minutes left and we have not finished our questions.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100929417b7bcaf7f8423880001024">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by>  Thank you, Madam Speaker. I am happy to answer questions the deputy leader might like to ask, but I cannot hear him when he interjects upon me, anyway. He does rather disturb my very eloquent train of thought, but I will get back to it. I was making the point, I think, that I discussed the issue with representatives of that particular hospital; so the answer to his question in the general sense was yes.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>