<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-09-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1081" />
  <endPage num="1143" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000485">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Attendance Procedure</name>
      <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000486">
        <heading>POLICE ATTENDANCE PROCEDURE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-14">
            <name>POLICE ATTENDANCE PROCEDURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-14T14:38:00" />
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000487">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-14T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:38):</by>  My question is to the Premier. If a rock being thrown at night through the window of a house belonging to a woman living alone is not enough to warrant police attendance, then what is?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-09-14">
            <name>POLICE ATTENDANCE PROCEDURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-09-14T14:38:00" />
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000488">
          <timeStamp time="2010-09-14T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT (Lee—Minister for Police, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing) (14:38):</by>  I am happy to answer the question. Look, I made a serious ministerial statement. I have put to the house all of the information that has been provided to me by the commissioner. That has now been shared with the house.</text>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000489">Obviously, we treat this as a very serious incident. The commissioner has defined it as an error in judgment. The call that was made to—</text>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000490">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000491">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT:</by>  Well, I don't know what you are laughing about. I wouldn't have thought it's a laughing matter. The call was made to 11444. The person who took the—</text>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000492">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000493">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000494">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT:</by>  Sorry. My apology, the call was made to 131444.</text>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000495">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000496">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! This is a serious issue and I would like to be able to hear the minister's response. I cannot hear a word.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000497">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT:</by>   The call was made to 131444 and, as the commissioner said yesterday, as a result of the information that was provided to the operator, the operator should have passed that information on to the communications centre, which would have then triggered a police car going off to this particular incident.</text>
        <text id="20100914160bf9610783487a80000498">Now, the commissioner has defined it as a mistake in judgment. Obviously, I am very sorry that a police car did not attend this incident. Clearly, it should have.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>