<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-06-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="655" />
  <endPage num="712" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Treasurer's Remarks</name>
      <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000459">
        <heading>TREASURER'S REMARKS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-24">
            <name>TREASURER'S REMARKS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-06-24T14:35:00" />
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000460">
          <timeStamp time="2010-06-24T14:35:00" />
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (14:35): </by> My question, again, is to the Treasurer. Is the reason the Treasurer went public on 2 June about his knowledge of the Adelaide Oval cost increase prior to the election because he became aware that Ian McLachlan told the media that day that he had sent a number of clear signals about the Adelaide Oval cost increase to the government steering committee in February prior to the election?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-24">
            <name>TREASURER'S REMARKS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-06-24T14:36:00" />
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000461">
          <timeStamp time="2010-06-24T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Federal/State Relations, Minister for Defence Industries) (14:36): </by> Can I say, first, that I have certainly referred already publicly to Mr McLachlan's interview that morning. I just offer a word of caution there in that I am aware that comments made by Mr McLachlan were refuted by Bruce Carter, the chairman of our steering committee—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. Evans</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000462">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans: </by> After you reacted to them.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000463">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> After who reacted to them?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. Evans</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000464">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans: </by> After you reacted to them.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000465">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> Sorry, me?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. Evans</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000466">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans: </by> Yes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000467">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> I did not react to them: that was Mr Carter.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. Evans</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000468">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans: </by> You didn't react to Mr McLachlan's comments?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000469">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="690" />
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000470">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> Mr Carter rejected that element of Mr McLachlan's contribution that—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. Evans</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000471">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. Evans: </by> That was after.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000472">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Davenport has already asked the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000473">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> I will try to do this again, Madam Speaker. They asked a serious question; I am attempting to give a serious answer. I would appreciate doing that with some degree of cooperation from members opposite. Certain comments by Mr McLachlan about what Mr Carter was advised were refuted by Mr Carter, I am aware, and Mr Carter received a letter from Mr McLachlan retracting and withdrawing those comments; and I understand that apology was read on ABC, and it may have been in <term>The Advertiser</term>; I am not sure.</text>
        <text id="2010062443c2695c8d224844a0000474">I have already said publicly that the comments of Mr McLachlan that morning were one of the reasons that prompted me to act on that day. I said that at the press conference on the day. I do not know what sort of research members opposite are doing. I guess today there would have been a no-confidence motion had it not been overwhelmed by a national political event, but they are really trying to ask the same question in about 15 different ways.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>