<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-06-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="655" />
  <endPage num="712" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Coroners (Reportable Death) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000004">
        <heading>CORONERS (REPORTABLE DEATH) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000005">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
          <startTime time="2010-06-24T10:32:00" />
          <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000006">
            <timeStamp time="2010-06-24T10:32:00" />
            <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (10:32):</by>  Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the Coroners Act 2003. Read a first time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000007">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
          <startTime time="2010-06-24T10:32:00" />
          <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000008">
            <timeStamp time="2010-06-24T10:32:00" />
            <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (10:32):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000009">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000010">In moving this bill, I will be referring to letters given to me by the Australian Funeral Directors Association (South Australian Division) in relation to this very simple issue. The Australian Funeral Directors Association has been in discussion with the government from before April 2008 about an issue that occurs in relation to reportable deaths interstate.</text>
          <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000011">When a citizen of South Australia dies interstate, the interstate coroner prepares a report. The South Australian Coroner also prepares a report, so there is a double reporting process and this delays the whole grieving process for the family of the deceased and puts them through extra time delay and extra pain. I am advised by the Australian Funeral Directors Association that in every other state those coroners recognise the work of the interstate coroner in relation to the deceased, so that there is only one reporting process.</text>
          <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000012">This bill gives power for the South Australian Coroner to recognise the work of an interstate coroner in relation to reportable deaths so that there is only one report into the reportable death and the whole process is quickened up for the grieving family of the deceased. It is cheaper, quicker and makes sense, so that is the simple intent of the bill.</text>
          <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000013">I will not speak any longer. I think the merits of this bill stand on its own. It is regrettable that, for whatever reason, the government has not dealt with this issue in the previous two years. I am hoping that, now that it is before the house, the government can see its way clear to support this bill. I say to the government that if it does have amendments that can improve this bill, I am open to accepting them subject to negotiations. I am not saying that this is the perfect model, but I am saying that this is the bill that will bring this matter to a head in the house so that we can make the whole process simpler for the grieving families of people who die interstate. With your agreement, Madam Speaker, hopefully, the government will agree to this bill.</text>
          <text id="201006240a6ac73854364256b0000014">Debate adjourned on motion of Mr Sibbons.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>