House of Assembly Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1) 52 1 Parliament of South Australia House of Assembly published Motions Mid Murray, Moveable Signs Restrictions MID MURRAY, MOVEABLE SIGNS RESTRICTIONS Adjourned debate on motion of Hon. R.B. Such: That council by-law No. 2 of 2009 of the Mid Murray Council entitled Moveable Signs Restrictions, made on 9 March 2010 and laid on the table of this house on 11 May 2010, be disallowed. (Continued from 26 May 2010.) Mr GOLDSWORTHY House of Assembly Kavel Mr GOLDSWORTHY (Kavel) (11:35): The state Liberals have a different view in relation to this motion. We will not be supporting the motion for disallowance in relation to the Mid Murray Council because our research shows that the council's by-law does not contain the similar restrictive provisions, as do the other councils. As a consequence, we do not see any reason for the disallowance of the by-law of the Mid Murray Council. Perhaps the member for Fisher may be inclined to carry out a little more research in relation to that specific by-law of the Mid Murray Council. By-law 10.2 refers to the provision of the District Council of Robe and the District Council of Mount Barker, 11.2 in Yankalilla, and 7 at the City of Port Augusta, so perhaps the member for Fisher may like to revisit the issue in relation to the Mid Murray Council. On that basis, we would not support the motion by the member for Fisher for the disallowance of that by-law of the Mid Murray Council. Debate adjourned on motion of Ms Thompson.