<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-06-22" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="507" />
  <endPage num="584" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Spooner Judgement</name>
      <text id="201006226ba856c864de4381a0000911">
        <heading>SPOONER JUDGEMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-22">
            <name>SPOONER JUDGEMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-06-22T16:17:00" />
        <text id="201006226ba856c864de4381a0000912">
          <timeStamp time="2010-06-22T16:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (16:17):</by>  Notwithstanding that the minister's information may be very important in due course, my question was actually as to whether a case has been sought from the DPP on this matter.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-22">
            <name>SPOONER JUDGEMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-06-22T16:18:00" />
        <text id="201006226ba856c864de4381a0000913">
          <timeStamp time="2010-06-22T16:18:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Tourism) (16:18):</by>  Yes, I am happy to answer that aspect of it. The honourable member asks an important question, and I have asked for advice about the matter.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>