<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-05-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="191" />
  <endPage num="264" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000869">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Member's Remarks</name>
      <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000870">
        <heading>MEMBER'S REMARKS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Finniss</electorate>
        <startTime time="2010-05-13T17:08:00" />
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000871">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-13T17:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY (Finniss) (17:08):</by>  I seek leave to make a personal explanation.</text>
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000872">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000873">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  The member for Light, in his Address in Reply speech, tried to indicate that I had made some derogatory remarks about local government in South Australia. I strongly repudiate that. Indeed, what I said this morning, as recorded in <term>Hansard</term>, was:</text>
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000874">
          <inserted>I talked earlier about councils and I want to return to councils. I, along with others in this place, had time in local government. In the 17 years I had there, I thought the world revolved around local government. You learn very quickly when you come into this chamber that local government does not count for a lot in the scheme of things.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000875">Hardly derogatory. It continues:</text>
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000876">
          <inserted>It is a bit like us with the feds, in that we do not count for a lot with the federal parliament.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="256" />
        <text continued="true" id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000877">I believe that the member for Light had misrepresented what I said, and I—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000878">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  On a point of order, this is a personal explanation, as I understand it, and it is not to contain debate or argument. A simple recital of what the member for Finniss actually said should be sufficient.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000879">
          <by role="member" id="619">An honourable member:</by>  That's what he's doing.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000880">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  No, he is now arguing.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000881">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER: </by> Member for Finniss, are you comfortable with that? I agree with the point of order. I am reading standing order 108.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201005139ed1611ab5cb4b8890000882">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  I have concluded what I wanted to say. The fact is that I was misrepresented by the member for Light.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>