<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-05-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="191" />
  <endPage num="264" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Port Augusta Health Services</name>
      <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000580">
        <heading>PORT AUGUSTA HEALTH SERVICES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-13">
            <name>PORT AUGUSTA HEALTH SERVICES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-13T14:56:00" />
        <page num="231" />
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000581">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-13T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (14:56):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Given the Rudd government's abandonment of the people of Port Augusta and the surrounding region in its budget—they have reneged on their commitment to provide an MRI service which would support the Upper Spencer Gulf, Port Augusta, outback and surrounding regions—will your government advocate to get that service in place?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-13">
            <name>PORT AUGUSTA HEALTH SERVICES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-13T14:57:00" />
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000582">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-13T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:57):</by>  I thank the—</text>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000583">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000584">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, member for Unley!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000585">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  Would you like to answer the question? I'm sure the others would like to answer the question, but unfortunately—</text>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000586">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000587">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, member for Unley!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000588">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  I thank the member for Stuart for his question. This is an important issue for that community. During the 2007 federal election, the then health minister, now Leader of the Opposition federally, made a rash promise to put an MRI machine into Port Augusta, contrary to all of the sound principles about the size of population that is required to make the implementation of an MRI machine work. The Rudd opposition matched that promise and they attempted to find—</text>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000589">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="46">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000590">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, member for Unley!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000591">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  This is a matter of some moment for the member for Stuart and for the population he represents. I would have thought that the member for Unley would at least if not give me the courtesy would give him the courtesy to get an answer so that he can take it back to his constituency rather than interrupt it in the very silly and trivial, childish way that he continues to do in this house.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000592">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon:</by>  Inane is the word I would use.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000593">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL:</by>  'Inane' is another word one might choose. The Rudd opposition made the equivalent promise, and then in government they attempted, as I understand it, to find a company that could meet the requirements of the tender because they put it out to tender. Unfortunately, I am advised that, not surprisingly, no company could properly satisfy the tender requirements that the commonwealth put forward. That is because the initial promise was a promise that probably shouldn't have been made because the population base is not sufficient to provide the throughput to make the machine viable and, therefore, to make the investment by the private company which will be running the machine profitable. That is the real problem. You need to have sufficient numbers of people using the machine on a regular basis to make it viable and to ensure that you have the skills base and the people with the relevant skills there to do it.</text>
        <text id="20100513ab0de60f43c343a9a0000594">All of those things had to occur and, as I understand it, the commonwealth government has not been able to make that happen. If the commonwealth government with all of its resources cannot do it, it would be very foolish indeed for this state to try to match that and end up with the same result—that is, that it can't be done. I think it would be very foolish for the member for Stuart to encourage his party to make that promise because if the other side were ever to get into office they would find it is a promise that they would not be able to satisfy because it just won't work in that environment.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>