<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-05-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="32" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Development Plans</name>
      <page num="23" />
      <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000382">
        <heading>DEVELOPMENT PLANS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-06">
            <name>DEVELOPMENT PLANS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-06T17:05:00" />
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000383">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-06T17:05:00" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (17:05):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Housing. Can the minister explain why regulations designed to fast track development approvals for projects under the commonwealth economic stimulus plan are being used to override established development plans and provide approval for developments which would otherwise be regarded as inappropriate?</text>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000384">I have been contacted by a member of the Naracoorte Lucindale District Council and local ratepayers expressing concerns that the South Australian Housing Trust is proposing to build multiple dwellings on sites on which such developments would not be approved under the local development plan and normal planning processes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-06">
            <name>DEVELOPMENT PLANS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-06T17:05:00" />
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000385">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-06T17:05:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (17:05):</by>  I am not quite sure where the deputy leader—I congratulate him on that elevation, and it is quite extraordinary with the number of votes he had that he got there.</text>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000386">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000387">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  He was the little train that could!</text>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000388">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000389">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I would like to, but your friend keeps interjecting. I assume he is your friend—you never know on that side.</text>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000390">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="619">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000391">
          <by role="member" id="619">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!  The minister, continue.</text>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000392">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000393">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I think it is hilarious, Madam Speaker, to get a whole range of interjections from the opposition about how we are not friends on this side. It is like Colonel Sanders demanding rights for chickens! I don't know where the deputy leader has been. The stimulus program was precisely that: it was a stimulus program. It was intended to put money on the ground as quickly as possible, and it worked. I have some breaking news: it actually worked. Australia and South Australia's economic performance has been outstanding by world standards.</text>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000394">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000395">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I know that their disappointment burns in them. Part of that was to shorten the process of approvals on stimulus projects, which has worked very successfully. It does not mean they apply different standards; they simply shorten—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000396">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams:</by>  They are. Answer my question: why are they?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20100506ebfbb82b800d4fe7b0000397">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I have explained why that has been taken. It is strange that it has worked. The member for MacKillop does not agree with it. I cannot help him with that disagreement.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>