<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-05-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="32" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Building the Education Revolution</name>
      <text id="20100506a3a916eb77c445ac80000374">
        <heading>BUILDING THE EDUCATION REVOLUTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-06">
            <name>BUILDING THE EDUCATION REVOLUTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-06T17:03:00" />
        <text id="20100506a3a916eb77c445ac80000375">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-06T17:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (17:03):</by>  I have a supplementary question for the Minister for Education. Will the state government provide the Yankalilla Area School with the difference in what is necessary for them to complete their gymnasium so that the children can use it as a result of this policy?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Early Childhood Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-06">
            <name>BUILDING THE EDUCATION REVOLUTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-06T17:03:00" />
        <text id="20100506a3a916eb77c445ac80000376">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-06T17:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Minister for Education, Minister for Early Childhood Development) (17:03):</by>  I will take the honourable member's question on notice. I am not precisely clear about the scope of works in that particular project. In the broad, though, the answer to the question is that the cost of doing the project has to fit within the BER funding.</text>
        <text id="20100506a3a916eb77c445ac80000377">I think the commonwealth has been very flexible with particular sites in trying to find ways of making these projects fit, given the time lines and given the fact that this is a national scheme with national guidelines. As I said, we welcome the scrutiny. As the Minister for Infrastructure mentioned, this has been an incredibly well-run scheme. We welcome the scrutiny of the small number of cases where concerns have been raised.</text>
        <text id="20100506a3a916eb77c445ac80000378">I do not rule out the fact that adjustments might have to be made. In answer to the question that has been put to me about why these additional components of the project are being visited on the school as opposed to being picked up by the state government, the truth is that they are part and parcel of the project, but if there are things that can be sensibly done I will look into that and respond to the member.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>