<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2010-05-06" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, First Session (52-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1" />
  <endPage num="32" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Building the Education Revolution</name>
      <text id="201005069ab3d596eb3f4f7fa0000361">
        <heading>BUILDING THE EDUCATION REVOLUTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-06">
            <name>BUILDING THE EDUCATION REVOLUTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-06T16:56:00" />
        <page num="21" />
        <text id="201005069ab3d596eb3f4f7fa0000362">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-06T16:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (16:56): </by> My question is to the Minister for Education. Now that the official national inquiry has been launched into the cost blowouts of the BER stimulus program, will task force head Brad Orgill and his 30 staff have as much difficulty getting a list of complaints from DECS as I have? I was refused access to documents through FOI, the excuse being that my inquiry was too broad and required too many resources of the department to comply.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Early Childhood Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-05-06">
            <name>BUILDING THE EDUCATION REVOLUTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2010-05-06T16:57:00" />
        <text id="201005069ab3d596eb3f4f7fa0000363">
          <timeStamp time="2010-05-06T16:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Minister for Education, Minister for Early Childhood Development) (16:57): </by> The reason the FOI request was rejected is that the member for Unley was invited to get back to the agency to respond and narrow his request from a request that would have required us to look at every document concerning every school and every document that touched the BER so that we could establish whether anything looked like a complaint. You can bet your life that, if we pulled out just a few concerns that did exist, there would be howls of complaint that we had not carried out a thorough exercise. Therefore, wanting to be thorough, we asked him to narrow his request because, frankly, there is not a file on complaints, because there are just not enough to justify one. Because we wanted to be thorough and answer the request in a diligent fashion, we simply asked him to narrow his request beyond every document that exists in a school or every document that exists in the BER program. He refused to do that so, on that basis, the application was rejected.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>