<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-12-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4933" />
  <endPage num="5002" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Bribery Investigation</name>
      <text id="200912022eb0c33a13774f0790000662">
        <heading>BRIBERY INVESTIGATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-12-02">
            <name>BRIBERY INVESTIGATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-12-02T15:13:00" />
        <text id="200912022eb0c33a13774f0790000663">
          <timeStamp time="2009-12-02T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (15:13): </by> Mr Speaker, I have a supplementary question. If this matter was raised as a result of an anomaly that was detected, as the minister just indicated, why were three separate investigations undertaken and reported on in three separate Auditor-General's reports on the operation of TRUMPS before this alleged anomaly was detected?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-12-02">
            <name>BRIBERY INVESTIGATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-12-02T15:13:00" />
        <text id="200912022eb0c33a13774f0790000664">
          <timeStamp time="2009-12-02T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (15:13): </by> Once again, the member does not go so far as to mislead this place, but she has certainly been misleading in the public forum. These have nothing to do with the matters reported in the Auditor-General's Report. Let me give you my unequivocal statement. The advice that I have been given clearly and unequivocally is that these have nothing to do with those historic matters referred to in the Auditor-General's Report. It cannot be clearer than that. If the member wants to persist in making things up, like the Leader of the Opposition does, I cannot help her.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200912022eb0c33a13774f0790000665">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND: </by> Sir, the Minister for Transport just accused me of making things up, and I take offence at the statement.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200912022eb0c33a13774f0790000666">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER: </by> The Minister for Transport.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200912022eb0c33a13774f0790000667">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> Sorry, sir. I think when you tell people that they make trams at Islington—and they have not made a tram in South Australia for 52 years—you are making things up.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200912022eb0c33a13774f0790000668">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Hammond.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>