<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-12-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4861" />
  <endPage num="4935" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>State Sports Park</name>
      <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000918">
        <heading>STATE SPORTS PARK</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="530" kind="question">
        <name>Ms THOMPSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Reynell</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-12-01">
            <name>STATE SPORTS PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-12-01T15:17:00" />
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000919">
          <timeStamp time="2009-12-01T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="530">Ms THOMPSON (Reynell) (15:17):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing? Is he aware of a proposal to sell land that is currently home to State Sports Park?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-12-01">
            <name>STATE SPORTS PARK</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-12-01T15:17:00" />
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000920">
          <timeStamp time="2009-12-01T15:17:00" />
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT (Lee—Minister for Police, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing) (15:17):</by>  I was astonished to hear last week, and again on ABC Radio yesterday morning, that the Liberals intend to sell 140 hectares of land at Gepps Cross to fund their city stadium—a city stadium which, at the last count, will cater for 80,000 spectators. It seems that the capacity of their proposed stadium changes depending on what day it is. I was astounded by their announcement because the land they are proposing to sell is home to the Super-Drome—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000921">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  On a point of order, I do not believe that the answer the minister is giving has any relevance at all to the question asked, which was: is he aware of a proposal to sell land?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000922">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I will listen to the answer, but at the moment I think he is answering the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4907" />
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000923">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT:</by>  Thank you, sir. I was astounded by their announcement because the land they are proposing to sell is home to the Super-Drome and the Distinctive Homes hockey stadium.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000924">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  On a point of order, this has long tinged my curiosity: I understand that in the House of Commons, from whom we take our lead, it is out of order to read speeches or, indeed, answers to questions. I do not believe that the minister is using copious notes; I believe that he is reading, and I challenge him to answer the question without his notes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000925">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! There is no point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000926">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT:</by>  It is also home to the Croatian Sports Centre, which is—</text>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000927">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000928">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000929">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT:</by>  Since the opposition leader announced plans to sell off land at Gepps Cross, I have been searching high and low to find out where a new velodrome and hockey stadium will be built. I am sure that the owners of the Croatian Sports Centre have been doing the same thing, as they would be eager to find out what the Liberals have planned for them, considering they own the land the Liberals intend to sell. Last week, I managed to download a copy of their policy, entitled 'New Stadium at Riverside West', before it mysteriously disappeared off isobelredmond.com. Unfortunately, we are yet to hear anything about their plans for the Super-Drome, hockey stadium and Croatian Sports Centre.</text>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000930">This proposal by the Liberal Party must be one of the sloppiest, half-baked policies I have ever seen. They claim a significant portion of the funding for their new stadium will be generated by the sale of government land. The fact is that a maximum area of only 55 hectares is available for development at Gepps Cross. Even if you include the Super-Drome, hockey stadium, Croatian Sports Centre and other land, or redevelop, there is still only around 95 hectares available. That is a long way off the 140 hectares the Leader of the Opposition plans to sell. We are also well aware of the intentions to sell off land at West Lakes that they do not even own. It is utter nonsense and grossly misleading to South Australians.</text>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000931">The Leader of the Opposition must tell South Australia what her plans are for the velodrome, hockey stadium and Croatian Sports Centre—if they plan to sell the land, where they will build new facilities and how they will fund this; if they will not sell the land, how they will fund their new stadium. The hockey stadium at State Sports Park is not only the home of hockey in South Australia but also hosts training and events of other sports, making it a vital piece of sporting infrastructure. Hockey SA has over 12,000 members and the majority of them use the facility seven days a week for up to 10 hours a day.</text>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000932">The velodrome is also used by thousands of people each year and is home to the AIS cycling program, Cycling SA and other cycling clubs. The velodrome is also used by hockey and taekwondo clubs for indoor training, competition and events. It is estimated that a new velodrome would cost in the vicinity of $10 million to $20 million as a bare minimum, while a new hockey stadium would cost at least $14 million. Then there is the cost of acquiring and relocating the Croatian Sports Centre. Perhaps the Liberals—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000933">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY: </by> Mr Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I wonder whether you could read out the question again because I think the minister has lost track of what the question was. He has got the wrong answer. He is doing a Dorothy Dixer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000934">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! There is no point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009120175da6e26c87943a190000935">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT: </by> Perhaps the Liberals have decided cycling and hockey sporting groups are not worthy of these facilities and will build a new stadium to the detriment of grassroots sports. It is clear this proposal has not been well thought out and there are gaping holes in their plan which, so far, has raised more questions, rather than providing answers. But, more importantly, the figures just do not add up. They say that they are going to sell 140 hectares of land that does not exist and they will be selling land that they do not own. One day they say the capacity for the proposed stadium will be 50,000: the next day it leaps to 80,000. This kind of shoddy policy work is what we have come to expect from the Liberals. It demonstrates that they are simply not fit to govern.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>