<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-12-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4861" />
  <endPage num="4935" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Election Promises</name>
      <text id="20091201891a47f5c6b04bc1a0000870">
        <heading>ELECTION PROMISES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-12-01">
            <name>ELECTION PROMISES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-12-01T15:06:00" />
        <text id="20091201891a47f5c6b04bc1a0000871">
          <timeStamp time="2009-12-01T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:06):</by>  My question is again to the Treasurer. Can the Treasurer be trusted on his election promises, given his record of keeping his promises at the last election?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4904" />
        <text id="20091201891a47f5c6b04bc1a0000872">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! I can either rule it straight out of order or I can give the Treasurer a level of indulgence commensurate with the indulgence that I think the deputy leader is asking for in the question. Does the deputy leader want an opportunity to rephrase his question, or does he want to stick to it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3118">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091201891a47f5c6b04bc1a0000873">
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS:</by>  I am prepared to accept it as it is expressed, with my explanation, though, sir, if I may seek your leave.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091201891a47f5c6b04bc1a0000874">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER: </by> Let us hear the explanation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3118">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091201891a47f5c6b04bc1a0000875">
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS:</by>  The Treasurer was asked on radio on 16 March 2006 during the election campaign whether he would fund his election promises by cutting jobs. He said in response:</text>
        <text id="20091201891a47f5c6b04bc1a0000876">
          <inserted>No. All these spendings can be provided through appropriate efficiencies and savings within a budget.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20091201891a47f5c6b04bc1a0000877">However, after the election, at the 2006-07 budget, the Treasurer announced some 1,571 public jobs would be cut through the Greg Smith review and then, on 19 December 2008, the Treasurer announced that a further 1,600 public sector jobs would be cut, taking the total job cuts to almost 3,200 during the government's current term.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-12-01T15:07:00" />
        <text id="20091201891a47f5c6b04bc1a0000878">
          <timeStamp time="2009-12-01T15:07:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (15:07):</by>  Many personal failings I may have, but I hope and trust that the parliament knows that I will do all in my power to ensure that a consistent set of policies are delivered should we win office at the next election. I do not think we could have been more upfront in saying that we have a massive savings task; that job losses will be a factor in it because of the need to ensure that we keep our finances in the black; that we will continue to maintain fiscal rectitude; and I am confident that, with our unprecedented candour and openness about what we intend to do should we win government, quite frankly, I think we should be applauded.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>