<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-11-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4785" />
  <endPage num="4863" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration (Registration of Deaths) Amendment Bill</name>
      <page num="4787" />
      <text id="200911195fd70e0051ba48ab80000040">
        <heading>BIRTHS, DEATHS AND MARRIAGES REGISTRATION (REGISTRATION OF DEATHS) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="200911195fd70e0051ba48ab80000041">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="200911195fd70e0051ba48ab80000042">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="200911195fd70e0051ba48ab80000043">(Continued from 19 February 2009. Page 1645.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="3129" kind="speech">
          <name>Ms SIMMONS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
          <startTime time="2009-11-19T10:42:00" />
          <text id="200911195fd70e0051ba48ab80000044">
            <timeStamp time="2009-11-19T10:42:00" />
            <by role="member" id="3129">Ms SIMMONS (Morialta) (10:42): </by> I would like to speak very briefly to this. The government opposes the bill. The bill proposes that if a person dies in South Australia leaving an opposite-sex de facto partner, that person's name and the deceased's age when they began living together should be recorded as part of the official registration of the death.</text>
          <text id="200911195fd70e0051ba48ab80000045">The government agrees with the member for Davenport that a surviving de facto partner should be acknowledged in the registration of the death. However, as it is the government's policy to avoid unjustified discrimination between same-sex couples and opposite-sex de facto couples, it should be extended to cover domestic partners, as that term is defined in the Family Relationships Act 1975 whether or not that person is of the opposite sex to the deceased.</text>
          <text id="200911195fd70e0051ba48ab80000046">The bill before the house proposes to deny equal recognition to same-sex partners, so the government does not support it in its current form. Instead, the government intends to vary the regulations to the act so as to require funeral directors to supply, and the registrar to record, the name of the person's domestic partner, if any, at the date of death. This is a much simpler process, thus the government believes that there is no need to amend this act.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
          <startTime time="2009-11-19T10:44:00" />
          <text id="200911195fd70e0051ba48ab80000047">
            <timeStamp time="2009-11-19T10:44:00" />
            <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (10:44): </by> I thank the member for her contribution.</text>
          <text id="200911195fd70e0051ba48ab80000048">Second reading negatived.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>