<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-11-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4785" />
  <endPage num="4863" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <page num="4828" />
      <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000837">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="537" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CICCARELLO</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Norwood</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-11-19">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-11-19T15:00:00" />
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000838">
          <timeStamp time="2009-11-19T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="537">Ms CICCARELLO (Norwood) (15:00): </by> My question is to the Minister for Health. What are the latest developments towards the construction of South Australia's new health and medical research institute and how does the proposal for the current RAH impact on research?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-11-19">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-11-19T15:00:00" />
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000839">
          <timeStamp time="2009-11-19T15:00:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (15:00): </by> As many members would know, the commonwealth government has supported our proposition to build a new state-of-the-art health and medical research institute on the City West campus. Construction works are anticipated to begin in February next year and be completed by 2012. This will give us capacity in our new facility for about 670 medical and health researchers. This is exactly what the research—</text>
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000840">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000841">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Morphett.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000842">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> This is exactly what the health and medical research community has been asking for and what we are pleased to provide. This facility will be adjacent to the new, world-class RAH on the same site, which will allow research and teaching services to be provided from the one site in the most modern buildings capable of being provided.</text>
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000843">This contrasts with the opposition's proposition yesterday. If one looks at the flyover on their website, it shows they are demolishing a set of buildings on the Frome Road site of the RAH where they will construct a 800-bed facility at some stage unnamed in the future. These buildings just happen to be where IMVS (where millions of pathology tests are carried out) and the Hanson Institute for Cancer Research (one of the state's most respected research bodies) are located.</text>
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000844">In addition, under their proposition they will demolish not only the IMVS building and all the work that happens there but also the historically important Eleanor Harrold Building, which contains the lecture theatre where medical students are taught.</text>
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000845">One of the great criticisms of the government's proposition is that it would cut off the hospital from research, pathology services and education, yet under the Liberals' proposition that was unveiled yesterday they will demolish all the buildings in which those services are provided. The hypocrisy from those opposite is just staggering.</text>
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000846">Nowhere in their plans can we see—and I would be happy for them tell us—where they are proposing to locate IMVS and research and teaching facilities. They have a bizarre plan. They want to put 1,800 beds on the RAH site, with none of the facilities required to service the patients and no research and no teaching at all. This is a half-baked proposition with a $700 million black hole. It demonstrates the division in the Liberal Party between the spokesperson on health and the opposition leader. It shows confusion. It is a misleading attempt to try to get the public of South Australia to believe that they actually have a plan—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000847">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Bring on the election.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200911192f990689ff56472c90000848">
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL: </by> —yes, indeed—when all they have is a bunch of half-baked ideas.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>