<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-11-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4719" />
  <endPage num="4786" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="200911184265bf03198543f2a0000305">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="200911184265bf03198543f2a0000306">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-11-18">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-11-18T14:15:00" />
        <text id="200911184265bf03198543f2a0000307">
          <timeStamp time="2009-11-18T14:15:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:15): </by> My question is for the Premier. Given the Treasurer's statement in this house last night that 'unless we can find a way to rebalance how we fund this, in 20 years health will consume, if not all, pretty close to all our state budget', will the government now adopt the Liberal opposition plan and rebuild the Royal Adelaide Hospital on its current site, saving the South Australian taxpayers up to $1 billion in construction costs?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-11-18">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-11-18T14:15:00" />
        <page num="4742" />
        <text id="200911184265bf03198543f2a0000308">
          <timeStamp time="2009-11-18T14:15:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (14:15): </by> The Liberals have one solution for our hospitals, which is to privatise them. We caught them out, we took one back—Modbury Hospital—to get it back into public ownership and management. But they were planning to sell the QEH. So, do not be fooled, privatisation of our hospitals is back on the Liberals' agenda. But again, let us go through—</text>
        <text id="200911184265bf03198543f2a0000309">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200911184265bf03198543f2a0000310">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200911184265bf03198543f2a0000311">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  —what a difference the Labor government makes. Compared to when you were last in government, nearly 1,100 extra doctors, 3,600 extra nurses. More doctors per capita than the other states, more nurses per capita than the other states, more beds per capita than the other states. Of course, we had seven different plans and models for the hospital and, in the last two weeks, we have had two more. Total confusion, total division, on the Liberal side.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>