<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-11-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4623" />
  <endPage num="4722" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Development (Regulated Trees) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001151">
        <heading>DEVELOPMENT (REGULATED TREES) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001152">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001153">Adjourned debate on second reading (resumed on motion).</text>
        <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001154">(Continued from page 4645.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="2819" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. R.B. SUCH</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Fisher</electorate>
          <startTime time="2009-11-17T17:57:00" />
          <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001155">
            <timeStamp time="2009-11-17T17:57:00" />
            <by role="member" id="2819">The Hon. R.B. SUCH (Fisher) (17:57):</by>  I was cut down in my prime; I will be very brief. The challenge in coming up with a management regime for urban trees is very difficult. It is a very complex issue. I believe the bill before us has the potential to be good or very good. I say 'potential' because the critical issue will be how it is finalised through regulation. I believe the intentions of the minister for planning (Hon. Paul Holloway) are appropriate and honourable, and I believe he will come up with a set of regulations which will protect trees that should be protected and allow trees to be removed that should not have been planted in the first place.</text>
          <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001156">I just make a couple of points. Not all trees are equal. I also make the point that not all greenery is good. Some people planted inappropriate trees, whether or not they be native, for example, Tasmanian blue gum (eucalyptus globulus), too close to their house. Those trees should be able to be removed easily and with the least expense.</text>
          <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001157">What we need to be protecting, as far as possible is, first, indigenous trees, particularly those endemic to a particular area; secondly, native trees, appropriate ones, not close to a house; and then thirdly, exotic trees. I am not a purist when it comes to the planting of trees but I think we should as far as possible take into account ecological aspects which the current provisions relating to trees do not do.</text>
          <page num="4697" />
          <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001158">We need to look at the environmental aspects of the tree, the aesthetic aspects and so on and not simply the size, and I think what is in this bill is the potential for some good management of urban trees. It does not please everyone—you will never please everyone—but I think that, if the regulations are drawn up appropriately, we have the basis for good urban tree management and I support the bill.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="1808" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Napier</electorate>
          <portfolios>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Employment, Training and Further Education</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
            </portfolio>
            <portfolio id="">
              <name>Minister for Science and Information Economy</name>
            </portfolio>
          </portfolios>
          <startTime time="2009-11-17T17:59:00" />
          <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001159">
            <timeStamp time="2009-11-17T17:59:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1808">The Hon. M.F. O'BRIEN (Napier—Minister for Employment, Training and Further Education, Minister for Road Safety, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (17:59):</by>  I have very few concluding remarks other than to commend the member for Fisher for his comments. He was very much a mover of the original legislation. The intent of the bill that we have before us is to further strengthen the law and actually protect what are truly significant trees.</text>
          <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001160">Bill read a second time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Third Reading</name>
        <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001161">
          <heading>Third Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001162">Bill read a third time and passed.</text>
        <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001163" />
        <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001164">
          <event>[Sitting suspended from 18:00 to 19:30]</event>
        </text>
        <text id="2009111752aaacc9eb954c3580001165" />
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>