<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-11-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4623" />
  <endPage num="4722" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Forensic Science SA</name>
      <text id="20091117da2d5bad60c44d49b0000515">
        <heading>FORENSIC SCIENCE SA</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-11-17">
            <name>FORENSIC SCIENCE SA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20091117da2d5bad60c44d49b0000516">In reply to <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition)</by> (30 June 2009) (Estimates Committee B).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-11-17">
            <name>FORENSIC SCIENCE SA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20091117da2d5bad60c44d49b0000517">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON (Croydon—Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Multicultural Affairs, Minister for Veterans' Affairs):</by>  There are many issues that impact the time taken for the Coroner to finalise matters that come before him. One of these is the time for the delivery of the final post mortem reports  from Forensic Science SA (FSSA) pathologists. At the end of July, 2009 there were 455 pathologist reports outstanding, the oldest of which was from a post mortem conducted 11 months ago. Most of the final post mortem reports are delivered to Coroner within three to six months of the post mortem examination.</text>
        <text id="20091117da2d5bad60c44d49b0000518">FSSA generally assigns priority for completion of post mortem reports by chronological order. The exceptions to this rule are reports for court hearings, including homicide and some traffic matters. Reports on child deaths are given priority where possible. These priorities may be subject to the availability of other specialist reports from within FSSA and from SA Pathology.</text>
        <text id="20091117da2d5bad60c44d49b0000519">FSSA has been working to reduce the time for delivery of all final reports and would pleased to further prioritise the reports if a mechanism for demonstrating hardship was available, being ever mindful that moving one case up in priority means moving others down.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>