<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-10-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4551" />
  <endPage num="4624" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Law and Order Issues Postcard</name>
      <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000554">
        <heading>LAW AND ORDER ISSUES POSTCARD</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-29">
            <name>LAW AND ORDER ISSUES POSTCARD</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-29T14:37:00" />
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000555">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-29T14:37:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (14:37):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. The Attorney-General advised the house on 27 October: 'I will ask my staff and get an answer for the member for Bragg.' I now ask the Attorney-General if he will inform the house if his office was involved in the dirty tricks postcard campaign.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000556">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Again, the insertion of debate into the question. The Attorney-General.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-10-29T14:38:00" />
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000557">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-29T14:38:00" />
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON (Croydon—Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Multicultural Affairs, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (14:38):</by>  The whole argument about the DL card does not actually refer to the substance of it. The Liberal Party don't object to the words in the—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000558">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000559">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order, the member for Unley.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000560">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  The question was about whether the Attorney-General's office was involved.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000561">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000562">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  It's quite simple.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000563">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! The member for Unley will take his seat. The Attorney.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000564">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  So, the only thing that the parliamentary Liberal Party quibble with, about the card, is the return address. They don't—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000565">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order. This was about whether the Attorney-General's office was involved.</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000566">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000567">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000568">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  He said he'd get back to us—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000569">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000570">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  —and 48 hours later—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4589" />
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000571">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  —for Unley will take his seat. Can I patiently explain to the member for Unley: when you want to raise a point of order, you point out what the standing order is that you believe is being infringed. It is not an opportunity for you to start engaging in accusations, or whatever, across to the other side of the chamber. If you continue abusing points of order in that way I will simply ignore you. The Attorney-General.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000572">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  The substance of the card is that the parliamentary Liberal Party has had its machinations in the committee stage of the youth offenders bill conveyed to the public of South Australia. That is what they are objecting to.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000573">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  On a point of order—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000574">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order, the member for Finniss.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000575">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  Sir, with respect, the point of order is relevance. The question was quite specific to the Attorney-General about communication with his office—quite specific, not the rest of the verbal diarrhoea he is going on with.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000576">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  No, there is no point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000577">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  So, there was a debate in this parliament on the youth offenders bill, how to deal with the so-called Gang of 49, and as—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000578">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  On a point of order, sir—127, digression. This is not the substance of the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000579">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  The substance of the question is about the DL card. The Attorney-General.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000580">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  The parliamentary Liberal Party is trying to cover up what it did in this house and the other place.</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000581">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000582">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  So the member for Bragg interjects that she is proud that the other night—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000583">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  On a point of order, sir—</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000584">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="7">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000585">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, the member for Bragg!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121">
        <name>Mr PENGILLY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000586">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr PENGILLY:</by>  Sir, I ask you to rule. The Attorney-General seems to be quite clearly debating the issue and not answering the substance of the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000587">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  There was debate in the question. I cannot really see how I can stop the Attorney.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000588">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  I know that the Liberal Party is going to try to censor my reply because it does not want the truth of this matter to get out.</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000589">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000590">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="549" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Venning</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000591">
          <by role="member" id="549">Mr Venning:</by>  It's the same as the dodgy documents.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3121" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pengilly</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000592">
          <by role="member" id="3121">Mr Pengilly:</by>  You're in it up to your ears, Mick.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000593">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000594">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  Mr Speaker, the member for Schubert has just accused me of being involved in the dodgy documents—a matter for which he has previously apologised and withdrawn. I ask him now to withdraw and apologise.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000595">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Schubert was making that allegation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="549">
        <name>Mr VENNING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000596">
          <by role="member" id="549">Mr VENNING:</by>  I withdraw. If his denial was there, I will withdraw the comment.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000597">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  When the Rann government tried to ensure that the revolving door in youth justice was stopped revolving—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4590" />
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000598">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  On a point of order, Mr Speaker, this is clearly debate. It has nothing to do with the question.</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000599">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000600">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  No, we asked about your involvement—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000601">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000602">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  —in a very tawdry campaign. That is what we asked you.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000603">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! The member for MacKillop will take his seat. There is no point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000604">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  Let's leave aside the question of the return address. The substance—</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000605">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000606">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  I will come to that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000607">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  On a point of order, Mr Speaker, standing order 98 states that the minister must answer the substance of the question. The minister has just said that he wants to leave aside the substance of the question. He just told the house that that is what he wants to leave aside.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000608">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! The member for MacKillop will take his seat. I am not in a position to rule anything on the minister's answer until I have an opportunity to hear it. The Attorney-General.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000609">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON:</by>  Under Mrs Redmond's leadership, the parliamentary Liberal Party took a position that it was opposed to members of the Gang of 49 who were youths spending longer in youth detention. They moved an amendment in this place, in the committee stage of the bill, so that we could not apply the serious repeat offender provisions that apply to adults to youths. Indeed, the member for Flinders said it is a violation of the human rights of young offenders to detain them. That is on the record.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000610">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> I rise on a point of order, Mr Speaker. Again, I refer to standing order 98. The reason we have that standing order is so that members, and particularly ministers—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000611">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  It is all right. I do not need to know why we have standing order 98.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000612">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  —cannot abuse the parliament.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000613">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for MacKillop will take his seat. There is no point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000614">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams: </by> He is misrepresenting the opposition's position.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000615">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! If any member feels that they have been misrepresented there is an appropriate course of action that they can take.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000616">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> Both in this chamber and in the other place the parliamentary Liberal Party sought to delete the words 'recidivist youth offender' and 'youth parole' from the bill. Indeed, they were doing it in the other place yesterday. So, the DL—</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000617">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000618">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000619">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000620">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, members on my left!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000621">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> So, the Liberal opposition does not complain about the substance or the words of the DL card. The substance or words of the DL card are true in every particular. They accurately represent—</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000622">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000623">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000624">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> —to the recipients the position that the parliamentary Liberal Party took—</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000625">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4591" />
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000626">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, the member for MacKillop!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000627">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> —on the bill.</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000628">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000629">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order, members on my left!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000630">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> So, the only thing—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000631">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> I rise on a point of order, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000632">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon: </by> This is ridiculous.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000633">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> It is ridiculous. I agree with the Leader of Government Business in the house. This is the very reason why we have standing orders, so that ministers—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000634">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000635">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> —cannot abuse the privileges they have in this place. This is an abuse of the parliament—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000636">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000637">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS: </by> —and you know it.</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000638">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000639">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The Attorney-General.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000640">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> It is plain from the <term>Hansard</term> that the parliamentary Liberal Party took the view that members of the Gang of 49 who were youths should not be detained for longer than they are now, and they also took a position against the Youth Parole Board. So, when the government tried to make sure that members of the Gang of 49 who were youths had to earn parole in the future, the Liberal Party opposed it. In fact, earlier this week they tried to redirect the proceeds from the sale of hoon drivers' cars from victims of crime to the rehabilitation of offenders.</text>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000641">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000642">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000643">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> Mr Speaker—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000644">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, the Attorney! I think the Attorney has canvassed—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000645">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> Yes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000646">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  —the Liberal Party's position with regard to this card. He now needs to direct himself to whatever his staff have done or have not done.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000647">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> The DL card issued by the Australian Labor Party is true and correct in every particular and, indeed, the parliamentary Liberal Party has not sought in its questioning to quote the words in the card.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000648">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN: </by> Sir, I rise on a point of order. You have allowed the Attorney-General to address the issue, which you have now ruled he has dealt with, and he needs to get on to the substance of the question. The substance of the question is: did he ask his staff and was he involved?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000649">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Attorney.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000650">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> Of course, the Australian Labor Party—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000651">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman: </by> Did you ask your staff?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000652">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000653">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman: </by> Did you ask your staff?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000654">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, the member for Bragg!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000655">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> The Australian Labor Party checked the substance of the card.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000656">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN: </by> Mr Speaker, I rise on a point of order. The Attorney-General directly said to this parliament two days ago that he would ask his staff—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4592" />
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000657">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000658">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN: </by> —and that is what I have asked him about; nothing to do with this other issue.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000659">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! The member for Bragg will take her seat. I do not think we are going to make any progress on this. The Attorney-General.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091029303a474486e04bd680000660">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> Mr Speaker, yes, I have asked my staff; and, yes, they did confirm the accuracy of the card for the Australian Labor Party. The question of what the reply paid block is going to be is not a matter of concern to the Attorney-General's office and we had no input.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>