<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4489" />
  <endPage num="4550" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>North-East Pastoral District</name>
      <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000639">
        <heading>NORTH-EAST PASTORAL DISTRICT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="562" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. G.M. GUNN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-28">
            <name>NORTH-EAST PASTORAL DISTRICT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-28T15:24:00" />
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000640">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-28T15:24:00" />
          <by role="member" id="562">The Hon. G.M. GUNN (Stuart) (15:24): </by> My question is directed to the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries. What action is he taking to assist constituents of mine in the north-east pastoral district of this state to ship out their stock due to the exceptional damage caused by the dust storm a few weeks ago?</text>
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000641">The minister would be aware that people in Sydney complained about the dust, but they only had a bit of inconvenience. My constituents in the north-east of the state have had their ability to make a reasonable livelihood drastically affected, and they have to get rid of the stock so they can be agisted in other parts of the state. Many of them are in financial difficulty, and I ask: what assistance can the minister provide to these people?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1802" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. CAICA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Colton</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-28">
            <name>NORTH-EAST PASTORAL DISTRICT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-28T15:25:00" />
        <page num="4526" />
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000642">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-28T15:25:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1802">The Hon. P. CAICA (Colton—Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development) (15:25): </by> I thank the member for Stuart for his question and acknowledge the outstanding work he has done in representing his constituents over many, many years. One of the difficulties we have had to date, and certainly in the reports that I have been receiving, is assessing the total damage and, importantly, the specific damage that has occurred on some of the properties. The information we are gathering is accumulating each day.</text>
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000643">The anecdotal evidence to date has indicated a range of damage to pastoral properties and livelihoods of those affected by the dust storm in the upper north-east area, although, to date, as I mentioned, the objective information has been difficult to collect.</text>
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000644">PIRSA has been working closely with the relevant contacts, and that has included the South Australian Farmers Federation. I noticed their comments in the paper today. In fact, we have been seeking information from them and they are using their resources as best they can, so I was a bit confused by Peter White's comments, or certainly found them curious.</text>
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000645">We have also been working with the northern regional drought task force, the SA Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, the Pastoral Board, the Outback Areas Community Development Trust, the Rural Financial Counselling Service and various other government agencies to assess the level of damage to enterprises. A survey has been sent to all pastoralists to assess the levels of damage, and responses are currently being collated.</text>
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000646">Both the South Australian drought assistance measures and provisions under the NDRRA are aligned with the nationally agreed policies in this area. The provisions of the New South Wales Rural Assistance Authority and the National Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements are very similar to the EC interest rate subsidy arrangements that, as I understand it, many of the member for Stuart's constituents are already in receipt of.</text>
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000647">South Australia, for decades, has aligned its policy with the national assistance policy and avoids, wherever possible, the use of market-distorting programs such as subsidies for transport, fodder and payment for water. Again, the member would be aware of that.</text>
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000648">Since this area is in an EC-declared area, we could offer (and this is what we are looking at) to extend the planning for recovery grant, even to those without the ECIRS approval, and this would support the preparation of a business plan, plus a grant to implement the plan.</text>
        <text id="200910281e5a8c2d97c142f690000649">I can say to the member for Stuart that I look forward to working with him and feeding the information that he has into the processes that we have in place to ensure that we are able to provide whatever practical assistance we can for, amongst other things, the agistment of stock, if that is what is required. If there is any other practical way to assist those pastoralists who have done it very hard over the last several years, the government will do whatever it can to support people in that region.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>