<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-10-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4489" />
  <endPage num="4550" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Law and Order Issues Postcard</name>
      <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000536">
        <heading>LAW AND ORDER ISSUES POSTCARD</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-28">
            <name>LAW AND ORDER ISSUES POSTCARD</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-28T15:06:00" />
        <page num="4521" />
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000537">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-28T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (15:06):</by>  My question is to the Premier. When the ALP state secretary appears before the caucus to explain his authorisation of the distribution of a postcard to South Australians last week, will he be required to address: one, why he ignored Australia Post guidelines to use the ALP's address for receipt of mail for Isobel Redmond; and, two, whether he plans to issue more mail pieces as part of Labor's dirty tricks campaign?</text>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000538">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000539">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The question is out of order on a number of grounds. For one, it is hypothetical, hypothesising that there may be a court appearance.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000540">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Caucus.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000541">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Caucus. I beg your pardon. I am sorry. I thought you said when he appears before court. Could the member for Bragg bring up the question so that I could have a look at it, please?</text>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000542">The question certainly contains debate. I think it is beyond what any minister might be responsible for; however, given that the member for Bragg has put it in the public sphere, I will allow the Deputy Premier the opportunity to respond.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-10-28T15:08:00" />
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000543">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-28T15:08:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (15:08):</by>  The reason I am answering this question is because I was acting chair of Tuesday's caucus meeting and it was my idea. I thought it was a sensible thing to do. Fancy us being accused of dirty tricks after the email forgery and after—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000544">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon:</by>  Catch Tim.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000545">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Yes.</text>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000546">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000547">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000548">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  The member for Bragg when she was president of the Liberal Party was part of the most—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000549">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS:</by>  I rise on a point of order, Mr Speaker. The Deputy Premier is clearly debating the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000550">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  Given that the question clearly and specifically accuses the Labor Party of engaging in a dirty tricks campaign, I think it is not at all unreasonable for the Deputy Premier to be given fair scope in responding to the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000551">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Under Catch Tim the then president of the Liberal Party concocted a convoluted scheme designed to hide from public—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000552">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker: I am happy to give a personal explanation on this, but this has been to the Electoral Commissioner and we were completely exonerated as a party, so don't try—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000553">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  As the member for Bragg says, she can give a personal explanation. The Deputy Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20091028b5e558c7bb6543f990000554">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  All I will conclude by saying is that there were many aspects of the then president's (the member for Bragg) tenure as president of the Liberal Party when it related to fundraising, and we will be more than happy to share those with the parliament in the months ahead.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>