<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4315" />
  <endPage num="4391" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Independent Commission Against Corruption</name>
      <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000515">
        <heading>INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-15">
            <name>INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T14:45:00" />
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000516">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:45):</by>  My question is to the Premier. If at least two independent state watchdogs—the DPP and the former auditor-general—are calling for the establishment of a state independent commission against corruption, why is the Premier still so steadfastly opposed?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000517">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  This question is pretty similar to one yesterday, but I will allow it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T14:46:00" />
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000518">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (14:46):</by>  I am happy to respond, sir. Regarding the former question, because I know that members were serious, I can say that while Labor is in power there will be school sport. Those of us—</text>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000519">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000520">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  No, no; if the Liberals want to get rid of—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000521">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The Premier will take his seat.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="563">
        <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000522">
          <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS:</by>  I have a point of order. Not even the Premier can make school sport come into an ICAC. It is relevance, Mr Speaker.</text>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000523">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000524">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The Premier must answer the substance of the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000525">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  Those who remember my appearances on the rugby fields of the Waikato will know my passion for this.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000526">
          <by role="member" id="627">An honourable member:</by>  Why didn't they play you on the wing?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000527">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  I did play on the wing; the right wing, actually.</text>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000528">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="39">Dr McFetridge interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000529">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  That's not far from the truth.</text>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000530">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000531">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  The mascot, that's right. Why are people so unkind? I can say, on the issue of ICAC, that we can keep doing this and doing this, in terms of repeats. This government has employed 550 extra police in South Australia, we have seen robberies go down 30 per cent, and we have seen a drop in crime in this state. We have an anti-corruption branch that does an outstanding job in this state; we have an Ombudsman with the powers of a royal commission; and we have an Auditor-General with enormous powers to carry out investigations. We also have a DPP to whom we gave extra resources; he wanted more and more resources for himself, and we delivered for his organisation. I remember going down there. I listened, and we delivered the extra money. He is independent as well.</text>
        <page num="4352" />
        <text id="200910150de24bf0f02046d6b0000532">I guess the point is: how much is it going to cost? From where are we to get the money? Would it not be better to have a national ICAC, like the former National Crime Authority, that is not appointed by politicians here, whether they are Liberal or Labor? Crime and corruption have no borders, and that is exactly the point we have been trying to get across in relation to the bikie legislation. We wanted everyone in it so that there were no safe havens.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>