<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4315" />
  <endPage num="4391" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000369">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>School Sports</name>
      <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000370">
        <heading>SCHOOL SPORTS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-15">
            <name>SCHOOL SPORTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T14:11:00" />
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000371">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T14:11:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (14:11): </by> As a proud Rotarian, I would like to address my first question to the Minister for Education. What assessment has been undertaken of all sporting and outdoor activities conducted by the department of education that contain a competitive element since the decision of the full court of the Supreme Court of South Australia in the case of Flavel v The State of South Australia?</text>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000372">In 1997, a 15 year old student in a public school was severely injured in a windsurfing accident. The state government maintained that it was not liable, but in November 2008 the plaintiff was finally successful on the appeal of the decision.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-10-15">
            <name>SCHOOL SPORTS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T14:12:00" />
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000373">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T14:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (14:12): </by> I will take that question.</text>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000374">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000375">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000376">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> As the minister responsible for SAICORP, the government's insurance corporation, is the leader questioning the government's tactics in that at all?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mrs Redmond</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000377">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs Redmond: </by> Would you like me to repeat the question?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000378">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> Sorry, I thought you were questioning the decision, which I had to carry over from your government.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000379">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND: </by> No. I will repeat the question, if I may, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000380">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000381">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND: </by> The question was: what assessment has been taken of all sporting and outdoor activities conducted by the department of education that contain a competitive element since that decision?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1806" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. LOMAX-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Tourism</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-10-15T14:13:00" />
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000382">
          <timeStamp time="2009-10-15T14:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1806">The Hon. J.D. LOMAX-SMITH (Adelaide—Minister for Education, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister for Tourism, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:13): </by> I was a little confused, because the member started talking about her Rotary membership, and I am not quite sure what relationship that had to the question. Clearly, this accident was a tragedy—an unforeseen accident, you might say; the sort of event that could occur in many outdoor activities. It was a tragedy for the individual involved and we would all offer sympathy and, in fact, respect the difficulties of being in that situation, because it would have been very difficult not only for the individual involved but also for their whole family.</text>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000383">Having said that, the judgment, of course, has had some impact on the way in which sports are regarded, but to suggest that competitive activities within schools are unacceptable would fly in the face of everything we as Australians understand about sport. Whilst it may be possible not to have competitive activities in some fitness regimes and some activities, I think that most people would regard it as entirely unacceptable to give up an entire sense of competition within sporting activities. It would destroy our interschool competitions, it would have an impact on sporting activities at junior levels and it would, I think, be entirely unacceptable for all parents as well, particularly as they are concerned about fitness.</text>
        <text id="200910155910e1f0e7c74c83a0000384">Having said that, there are some activities that clearly need to be reassessed, and the department has gone through a process of examining how sport is managed, how physical activity is managed and how extracurricular activities are managed beyond the classroom. This is obviously complex, but I can assure the leader that no-one would contemplate abandoning competitive sports within our schooling system. I think it would be an unacceptable response to that decision.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>