<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-09-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4023" />
  <endPage num="4097" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Water Security Minister</name>
      <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000452">
        <heading>WATER SECURITY MINISTER</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-23">
            <name>WATER SECURITY MINISTER</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-09-23T14:45:00" />
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000453">
          <timeStamp time="2009-09-23T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:45): </by> My question is to the member for Mawson. Did the member for Mawson, when questioned by <term>The Australian</term> newspaper about the tenure—</text>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000454">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000455">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Just let me hear the question, please.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3118">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000456">
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS: </by> Did the member for Mawson, when questioned by <term>The Australian</term> newspaper about the tenure of the Minister for Water Security, tell <term>The Australian</term> that the deal was only for last term and this term—'If you do a deal, you keep a deal'—and did he also tell other Labor MPs that he had written to the Premier to say that the Minister for Water Security should be removed from cabinet?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000457">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  The question is out of order. The member for Mawson has no responsibility to the house for comments he makes to a newspaper.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000458">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND: </by> Sir, can I seek a point of clarification on that ruling, please? Earlier this year, you made a ruling when the member for Mount Gambier asked a question of the member for Hammond and allowed a question from the member for Mount Gambier to the member for Hammond in this house.</text>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000459">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000460">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! If the Leader of the Opposition is referring to what I think she is referring to, that was a question about travel undertaken by the member for Hammond using his parliamentary travel budget and—</text>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000461">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000462">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! If the house will come to order I will attempt to clarify the matter for the Leader of the Opposition, but I am not going to be shouted down by members while I attempt to do so. The Leader of the Opposition would also be aware that the following day I made a definitive ruling regarding that question. The member for Hammond at the time was obviously keen to answer the question, and I allowed him to do so.</text>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000463">I am not saying that all questions to backbenchers are out of order. The question is whether the backbencher has some responsibility to the house with respect to the subject that is being asked about. In this case, the subject is comments that may or may not have been made by the member for Mawson to a newspaper, for which I cannot see the member for Mawson has any responsibility to the house at all.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000464">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON: </by> Sir, on the point of order, would it be equally out of order for me to ask a Liberal backbencher if they have backgrounded the media on the shortcomings of their leadership, or something like that?</text>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000465">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200909239f30b896ca454fdb90000466">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! Indeed, it would. The question is out of order. Does the deputy leader want to ask the next question?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>