<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3891" />
  <endPage num="3973" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ministerial Code of Conduct</name>
      <text id="200909104d62e9c1b10c431b80000623">
        <heading>MINISTERIAL CODE OF CONDUCT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-10">
            <name>MINISTERIAL CODE OF CONDUCT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-09-10T15:13:00" />
        <text id="200909104d62e9c1b10c431b80000624">
          <timeStamp time="2009-09-10T15:13:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition) (15:13):</by>  My question is again to the Premier. In agreeing to indemnify the Attorney-General's $210,000 defamation settlement with Deputy Chief Magistrate Cannon, did the Premier seek the Attorney-General's resignation from cabinet? Dr John Cornwall resigned on 4 August 1988 after he was found by the District Court to have defamed Dr Peter Humble. Dr Humble was awarded $80,000 plus legal costs which amounted to $70,000. According to Dr Cornwall, on 4 August 1988 cabinet agreed to indemnify him for the entire amount on condition that he resign his position as health and community welfare minister, and he resigned later that day.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ramsay</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Economic Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Social Inclusion</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-10">
            <name>MINISTERIAL CODE OF CONDUCT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-09-10T15:14:00" />
        <text id="200909104d62e9c1b10c431b80000625">
          <timeStamp time="2009-09-10T15:14:00" />
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN (Ramsay—Premier, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Social Inclusion, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change) (15:14):</by>  I am very happy to answer that question. I did not seek the Attorney-General's resignation because there was no reason to, just as you did not seek the resignations of premier Brown, who was criticised by the judge at the time; premier Olsen; minister Wayne Matthew; deputy premier Graham Ingerson; or many others.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200909104d62e9c1b10c431b80000626">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon:</by>  Rob Lucas twice in a row.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="634" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.D. RANN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="3933" />
        <text id="200909104d62e9c1b10c431b80000627">
          <by role="member" id="634">The Hon. M.D. RANN:</by>  Or Rob Lucas twice in a row. I am happy to go through them. On 28 May, <term>The Advertiser</term> reported that 'taxpayers may have to pick up a $175,000 legal bill for former minerals and energy minister, Wayne Matthew, despite a warning to the former Liberal government not to identify him.' Rob Lucas: 22 December 2000, <term>The Advertiser</term> reported that Mr Xenophon was awarded $20,000 after the government settled out of court in the first defamation case between him and Mr Lucas. It was reported that taxpayers paid the legal bills and defamation payout. Mr Xenophon launched a second case for $30,000 in damages over comments Mr Lucas made about Mr Xenophon accepting the $20,000.</text>
        <text id="200909104d62e9c1b10c431b80000628">Dean Brown: 27 February 1997, <term>The Advertiser</term> reported that taxpayers would have to pay $45,000 to settle a defamation case against former premier Dean Brown. It was also reported that Mr Brown recklessly attacked former health CE, Dr David Blaikie, forcing him to quit his job. The then Liberal government agreed to pay Dr Blaikie $700,000 and an annual pension. Graham Ingerson: an Adelaide law firm received a $30,000 out of court settlement against the then industrial affairs minister, Graham Ingerson, and so forth and so on.</text>
        <text id="200909104d62e9c1b10c431b80000629">I did not ask the Attorney-General to resign because that would have been unjust. If I had asked him to resign, he would not be sitting there, so it is a pretty unusual question to ask. However, the point of the matter is this: I believe that Magistrate Cannon got it wrong in his judgment, and I am very pleased that just as, with our case against the federal government in terms of a nuclear waste dump the Supreme Court agreed, just as the Federal Court agreed on that occasion with my judgment not sine die. They were ad idem.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>