<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-09-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3643" />
  <endPage num="3745" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>National Firearms Management System</name>
      <page num="3678" />
      <text id="20090908ff33bd5704b6414db0000430">
        <heading>NATIONAL FIREARMS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-08">
            <name>NATIONAL FIREARMS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090908ff33bd5704b6414db0000431">In reply to <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen—Leader of the Opposition)</by> (28 October 2008).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="636" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-09-08">
            <name>NATIONAL FIREARMS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20090908ff33bd5704b6414db0000432">
          <by role="member" id="636">The Hon. M.J. WRIGHT (Lee—Minister for Police, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing):</by>  The possible development of a National Firearms Management System (NFMS) has been a Ministerial Council—Police Emergency Management—Police (MCPEMP) agenda in recent years.</text>
        <text id="20090908ff33bd5704b6414db0000433">Funding was provided on a pro rata basis by all agencies to develop a business case which was presented to MCPEMP in 2007. The cost of the NFMS was estimated to be $58 million over five years. Due to the estimated costs and some concerns about the capacity of the NFMS to deliver anticipated savings and benefits, MCPEMP has resolved to explore alternatives. The matter was last discussed at MCPEMP in November 2008. </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>