<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-07-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3485" />
  <endPage num="3567" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Water for Good</name>
      <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000703">
        <heading>WATER FOR GOOD</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3120" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PEDERICK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hammond</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-07-15">
            <name>WATER FOR GOOD</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-07-15T15:06:00" />
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000704">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-15T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3120">Mr PEDERICK (Hammond) (15:06):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Water Security. Will the minister guarantee that any annual water surpluses in South Australia will be retained in the River Murray? The government's Water for Good plan identifies that by 2050 South Australia will have an annual water surplus of between 22 gigalitres and 58 gigalitres, subject to climatic conditions. The report calculates the surplus using a constant allocation of River Murray water of 130 gigalitres for Adelaide in both 2009 and 2050.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1783" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Chaffey</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water Security</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-07-15">
            <name>WATER FOR GOOD</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-07-15T15:06:00" />
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000705">
          <timeStamp time="2009-07-15T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1783">The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD (Chaffey—Minister for the River Murray, Minister for Water Security) (15:06):</by>  It is an interesting question asked by the member for Hammond, and once again demonstrates his lack of knowledge of how these water systems operate.</text>
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000706">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000707">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000708">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Your electorate's dying.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1783">
        <name>The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000709">
          <by role="member" id="1783">The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD:</by>  One of the interesting things is that my electorate is not dying anywhere near as quickly as the career of the member for Bragg. However, what I will say is that the lack of understanding of water supply issues and River Murray management issues, and the lack of understanding of how they interconnect and how—</text>
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000710">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="42">Mr Pederick interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000711">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order! The member for Hammond has asked his question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1783">
        <name>The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000712">
          <by role="member" id="1783">The Hon. K.A. MAYWALD:</by>  Let me explain it step by step for the member for Hammond. South Australia has a water allocation out of the River Murray for metropolitan Adelaide. It is a 650 gigalitre rolling licence. Of that, South Australia can take more in dry years and take less in wet years, depending on how our Mount Lofty supplies fare, and that means how the rainfall in the Mount Loftys fares.</text>
        <page num="3527" />
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000713">We have used that 650 rolling licence particularly well over the past decades to supply water into Adelaide. What will happen with the desal coming on line is that it gives us another option of water supply that can actually help to underpin and ensure that we have a climate dependent supply of water. The metropolitan Adelaide licence is non-tradeable licence, which means that if we do not use it for the metropolitan Adelaide use, then the only other use that it can be used for is the environment. That is the current situation, that will be retained, and that will remain.</text>
        <text id="20090715cc87b552f95c4135b0000714">When we are using water from the desalination plant and we are not needing to draw from the River Murray we have a number of options available to us. We have negotiated space in the dams of Hume and Dartmouth, and we can save some water up there for a not so rainy day, and we can use that water for the environment, and we will be very happy to use that water for the environment.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>