<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-06-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3281" />
  <endPage num="3346" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Wages</name>
      <text id="2009061890c57fa4bdbc4acd80000500">
        <heading>PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-18">
            <name>PUBLIC SECTOR WAGES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-18T14:57:00" />
        <text id="2009061890c57fa4bdbc4acd80000501">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-18T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder) (14:57): </by> I have a supplementary question, Mr Speaker. Therefore, Mr Treasurer, given your answer, why is it that the provision in 2009-10 for ministerial staff wages and salaries is increasing by 5.5 per cent?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009061890c57fa4bdbc4acd80000502">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by> I do not think that is a supplementary; I think it is a question. The Treasurer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-06-18T14:57:00" />
        <text id="2009061890c57fa4bdbc4acd80000503">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-18T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (14:57): </by> Again, I will get that. I assume it passes on to your staff as well, because I know we have to indemnify Kevin Naughton, on the initial advice, for matters relating to defamation. So, I assume any wage increases for ministerial advisers would pass on to your staff as well. I will check that. Whether that is to do with the number of employees or whether it is actual wages outcome as it relates to previous agreements—sorry?</text>
        <text id="2009061890c57fa4bdbc4acd80000504">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2009061890c57fa4bdbc4acd80000505">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY: </by> It's a good look. I will get an answer for the member.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>