<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-06-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3179" />
  <endPage num="3283" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Health and Medical Research Institute</name>
      <text id="200906175df8f26756784e8c80001002">
        <heading>HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-17">
            <name>HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-17T14:57:00" />
        <text id="200906175df8f26756784e8c80001003">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-17T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:57):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Will he identify where the $200 million federally funded health research institute is going to be built on the rail yards area, and is any remediation required to be undertaken for that part of the site?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="535" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.D. HILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Southern Suburbs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-17">
            <name>HEALTH AND MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-17T14:57:00" />
        <text id="200906175df8f26756784e8c80001004">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-17T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="535">The Hon. J.D. HILL (Kaurna—Minister for Health, Minister for the Southern Suburbs, Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts) (14:57):</by>  I thank the deputy leader for her question and for her acknowledgment that the research centre will be built on the site. It will not create enough room on the site for a football stadium or the Women's and Children's Hospital rebuild, which she seems to be advocating, but there will be plenty of room there for the new RAH as well.</text>
        <text id="200906175df8f26756784e8c80001005">When we approached the commonwealth government in relation to this, we said we wanted to build it and we needed to build it in close proximity to the new RAH, and we identified the railway site as the appropriate location. It will be built to the east of the hospital development; to the west of the skate park that is on the site now.</text>
        <text id="200906175df8f26756784e8c80001006">The issue of remediation is something which will be addressed. There are two remediation issues on the site. One is the level of hydrocarbons that are floating on top of the watertable. As I understand it, they are in the process of being removed. We need to do that by drilling and putting in an oil rig, really, to suck the hydrocarbons off the watertable. That would have to be done whether or not there was any redevelopment on the site, because there is always a risk of hydrocarbons approaching the Torrens.</text>
        <text id="200906175df8f26756784e8c80001007">The second issue is the remediation of the soil on the site. Of course, the construction of the hospital and the research facility will largely deal with that, because when the hospital and the research facility are built soil will be removed and taken away from the site and then, of course, a concrete pad would be put down over the site. As I understand it, in most circumstances that would be sufficient. There would be some perimeter which would need to be cleaned up, and that will occur as well.</text>
        <text id="200906175df8f26756784e8c80001008">There have been some extraordinary suggestions in the media—I think amplified by the Deputy Leader of the Opposition—that the clean-up of the site would cost $1 billion or thereabouts. I inform the house, the media and the world that we budgeted for a maximum of $40 million for clean-up of the site, and we anticipate the cost to be well below that. The exact price we are not releasing for commercial in confidence reasons. I can give the honourable member an upper limit, which is $40 million, and the advice I have is that the remediation costs will be considerably less than that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>