<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-06-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3097" />
  <endPage num="3180" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Teachers Dispute</name>
      <text id="2009061659b2d8f2eed8458b90000668">
        <heading>TEACHERS DISPUTE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-16">
            <name>TEACHERS DISPUTE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-16T15:02:00" />
        <text id="2009061659b2d8f2eed8458b90000669">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-16T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder) (15:02): </by> My question is to the Premier. How will the government's 2.5 per cent public sector wage growth policy impact on his commitment to accept the decision of the Industrial Relations Commission in the enterprise bargaining dispute between the government, the Australian Education Union and the 20,000 public school teachers and TAFE employees?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-16">
            <name>TEACHERS DISPUTE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-16T15:03:00" />
        <text id="2009061659b2d8f2eed8458b90000670">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-16T15:03:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (15:03):</by>  Mr Speaker, I will answer that question, although the employment minister could do so. It is outside. We have made an offer in good faith. The teachers, I would hope, would be mindful that it might not be a bad deal to accept, but that is going through arbitration. These questions were asked by media at the budget press conference. The opposition is awfully slow on the uptake. From memory, I said in a number of interviews that the teachers' EB is not included in this exercise: it is going forward. We have accepted a provision that we have in the budget (and I am not going to reveal that publicly). We have made a public offer, so the member can calculate that, of what we think the outcome of that enterprise bargaining negotiation will be, but our future savings going forward are not reliant upon the outcome of the teachers' dispute.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>