<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-06-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2965" />
  <endPage num="3047" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="2009060399f87a94ec0145abb0000383">
        <heading>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="question">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-03">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-03T14:22:00" />
        <text id="2009060399f87a94ec0145abb0000384">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-03T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Leader of the Opposition) (14:22):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. In order to guarantee a competitive tender process for the rail yards hospital, does the government intend to compensate any of the consortia for costs of bids and, if so, what will be the costs?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-03">
            <name>ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-03T14:22:00" />
        <text id="2009060399f87a94ec0145abb0000385">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-03T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (14:22):</by>  No, we have no intention of compensating; I do not know why we would. Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, which I think is one of the umbrella groups for companies participating in PPPs, came to me with this notion: would I be prepared to put a blanket guarantee out there that an incoming government would guarantee costs should a new government come in (a Liberal government) and scrap the project? I said, 'No; that is a risk you who will have to assume and assess whether or not you think there will be a change of government. If you think there will be a change of government, you have to bid accordingly.'</text>
        <text id="2009060399f87a94ec0145abb0000386">I have no intention of compensating bidders or putting upfront taxpayers' money to compensate in the outset. There are times when arguments might need to be made for compensation as a result of government actions, but there should be no issue with compensation in advance of any potential government action. This government is committed to that hospital. We have no problem with the number of people who will tender. The bid costs are not the issue. As I outlined to the house yesterday, how these projects are funded is an issue because the cost of capital for the private sector right now is at a premium, as both the availability is scarce and what is available comes at a reasonably high price.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>