<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-06-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2845" />
  <endPage num="2966" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Tramline Extensions</name>
      <text id="20090602fcbd7d9bdf444dd9b0000758">
        <heading>TRAMLINE EXTENSIONS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-02">
            <name>TRAMLINE EXTENSIONS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-02T14:56:00" />
        <page num="2938" />
        <text id="20090602fcbd7d9bdf444dd9b0000759">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-02T14:56:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:56):</by>  Did the Minister for Transport take into account the need to remove an estimated 450,000 tonnes of contaminated soil from the rail yard site in the city's west end when he made the decision to construct a tramline extension down North Terrace and onto Port Road? Four things are happening there contemporaneously. A site remediation of rail yards was to be done last year and is continuing now. A rail yard relocation is to be completed by June 2010 and, at the same site, the tram extension is to be completed by early 2010. The construction of the medical research facility at the rail yards is also to commence in early 2010.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-06-02">
            <name>TRAMLINE EXTENSIONS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-06-02T14:57:00" />
        <text id="20090602fcbd7d9bdf444dd9b0000760">
          <timeStamp time="2009-06-02T14:57:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (14:57):</by>  I will have to check that, but I congratulate the deputy leader. She does seem to be across our very good program for works. I might go on to help her further and say that, with the additions—</text>
        <text id="20090602fcbd7d9bdf444dd9b0000761">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="56">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090602fcbd7d9bdf444dd9b0000762">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  Yes, I just said it. I think she has pretty much got the program right. Yes, it is our program, so we did think about it. I can go on further and say that, after that, we will be rolling out a government stimulus package that you voted against. Further, we will be rolling out $600 million in public transport that your other leader came over and opposed here just last week. We will be rolling out a billion dollars in transport spend in a year for the first time in the history of the state. Yes, we have a big program, and thank you for pointing it out.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>