<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-05-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2765" />
  <endPage num="2846" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Court Registries</name>
      <text id="200905144bb4daf15b06499bb0000542">
        <heading>COURT REGISTRIES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="question">
        <name>Mrs REDMOND</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-05-14">
            <name>COURT REGISTRIES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-05-14T14:46:00" />
        <text id="200905144bb4daf15b06499bb0000543">
          <timeStamp time="2009-05-14T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs REDMOND (Heysen) (14:46): </by> My question is to the Attorney-General. On what basis does the Attorney-General seek to justify the closure of the court registries in Ceduna, Coober Pedy, Kadina and Naracoorte on all but sitting days?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Multicultural Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-05-14">
            <name>COURT REGISTRIES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-05-14T14:46:00" />
        <text id="200905144bb4daf15b06499bb0000544">
          <timeStamp time="2009-05-14T14:46:00" />
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON (Croydon—Attorney-General, Minister for Justice, Minister for Multicultural Affairs, Minister for Veterans' Affairs) (14:46): </by> The registries of those courts could get by with one full-time equivalent employee, or less than one full-time equivalent employee. In fact, there are two full-time equivalent employees for occupational health and safety reasons. We think that many of the functions of those registries outside the period when the court sits could be provided by other means.</text>
        <text id="200905144bb4daf15b06499bb0000545">Really, it does not lie in the mouth of the Liberal opposition to be talking about issues such as this when, to a man and a woman, it voted in this house to abolish resident magistrates in the country. The last Liberal government removed every resident magistrate, and the attorney-general of blessed memory, the Hon. K.T. Griffin, argued that you should not have resident magistrates on principle. Well, Mr Speaker, this Labor government—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200905144bb4daf15b06499bb0000546">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200905144bb4daf15b06499bb0000547">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  On a point of order, Mr Speaker. This is nothing to do with the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200905144bb4daf15b06499bb0000548">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:</by>  The question is about court registries. I think that the Attorney is drawing somewhat of a long bow. I will allow him to finish his answer if he wraps it up quickly.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="531">
        <name>The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200905144bb4daf15b06499bb0000549">
          <by role="member" id="531">The Hon. M.J. ATKINSON: </by> I do not see that courts make much sense when you have not got a magistrate. You need magistrate first, registry second.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>