<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-05-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2765" />
  <endPage num="2846" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Targeted Voluntary Separation Packages</name>
      <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000440">
        <heading>TARGETED VOLUNTARY SEPARATION PACKAGES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Goyder</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-05-14">
            <name>TARGETED VOLUNTARY SEPARATION PACKAGES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-05-14T14:19:00" />
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000441">
          <timeStamp time="2009-05-14T14:19:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS (Goyder) (14:19):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000442">
          <by role="member" id="627">An honourable member:</by>  Good luck!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3118" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr GRIFFITHS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000443">
          <by role="member" id="3118">Mr GRIFFITHS:</by>  Thank you. What is the estimated cost to government of targeted voluntary separation packages offered to Public Service employees this week? The Executive Director of the Department of the Premier and Cabinet invited employees of the department to apply for targeted voluntary separation packages this week. He referred employees to guidelines issued by the Department of Treasury and Finance which offer employees 2¼ years' salary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industry and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Federal/State Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-05-14T14:20:00" />
        <page num="2797" />
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000444">
          <timeStamp time="2009-05-14T14:20:00" />
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY (Port Adelaide—Deputy Premier, Treasurer, Minister for Industry and Trade, Minister for Federal/State Relations) (14:20):</by>  The government—they are a little bit slow on the uptake, the opposition—announced the fact that we are offering up to 1,600 voluntary separation packages in the Mid-Year Budget Review. What we have done is made a provision in the Mid-Year Budget Review for that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1813" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mrs Redmond</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000445">
          <by role="member" id="1813">Mrs Redmond:</by>  How much?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000446">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  My understanding—and I will get this checked—is that, prudently, we would have made full provision for the 1,600. I do not have the dollar figure for that. The final figure will be dependent upon how many of those 1,600 are taken up. And they are not all in this financial year; they are over a staggered period. We would estimate the year in which we assume these numbers would be taken up, I presume for the full uptake, but whether or not that occurs is a different story. Always remember that voluntary separation packages have a very quick payback period—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. Conlon</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000447">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. Conlon:</by>  That's why we do them.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000448">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  That's why we do them. I do not have the exact payback period in months; it is about 18 months. You can lock in that ongoing saving for a considerable amount of time. It is a mechanism that has been used consistently by former Liberal governments, and it has been used consistently, when appropriate, by this government when we have needed to relieve certain cost pressures on the budget—</text>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000449">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="65">Mr Williams interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000450">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, the member for MacKillop!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000451">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams:</by>  You particularly amuse me.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000452">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  Why I am I amusing you?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000453">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams:</by>  You don't even sound like you believe it yourself. I find that amusing.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000454">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000455">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  What? Are you saying that I'm not telling the truth?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000456">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams:</by>  Get on with it!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000457">
          <by role="member" id="627">The SPEAKER:  </by>Order, the member for MacKillop!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="532">
        <name>The Hon. K.O. FOLEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20090514713f4aef96d0491b90000458">
          <by role="member" id="532">The Hon. K.O. FOLEY:</by>  We have offered voluntary separation packages a number of times since coming to government, and they have been a necessary and very useful management tool to right-size the workforce and to provide savings and efficiencies within the government. I do not know how more open and upfront the member for MacKillop expects me to be, but that is the story.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>