<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-04-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2513" />
  <endPage num="2595" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Bail (Arson) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000014">
        <heading>BAIL (ARSON) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000015">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
          <startTime time="2009-04-30T10:35:00" />
          <text id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000016">
            <timeStamp time="2009-04-30T10:35:00" />
            <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (10:35):</by>  Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the Bail Act 1985. Read a first time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000017">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="563" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. I.F. EVANS</name>
          <house>House of Assembly</house>
          <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
          <startTime time="2009-04-30T10:35:00" />
          <text id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000018">
            <timeStamp time="2009-04-30T10:35:00" />
            <by role="member" id="563">The Hon. I.F. EVANS (Davenport) (10:35):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000019">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000020">What this bill does is complement the first bill, in that it is sending a message to arsonists and the community that the parliament is serious about dealing with arson and related offences. This bill reverses the presumption of bail for those people charged with arson offences. Already under the act there is the ability, for certain offences, for the presumption of bail to be reversed.</text>
          <page num="2514" />
          <text id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000021">This bill brings arson offences into that category of offences where the presumption of bail is reversed. The practical effect of it is that if charged with arson, rather than the prosecution having to argue why bail should not be allowed, the accused, through their lawyers, would have to argue why bail should be allowed. So, it reverses the presumption of bail in relation to arson offences.</text>
          <text id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000022">Again, it is a very simple bill. It is about sending a message to the community and to arsonists that what they do is not going to be tolerated by the parliament. I think we should make it as tough as we can on the arsonists under the procedures we have available to us. Hopefully, when it comes to the vote the government and the house will support it.</text>
          <text id="20090430f17f4504a038464fa0000023">Debate adjourned on motion of Mrs Geraghty.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>