<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-04-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2513" />
  <endPage num="2595" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Chapley Retail Group</name>
      <text id="20090430511368c626a6431ea0000566">
        <heading>CHAPLEY RETAIL GROUP</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-04-30">
            <name>CHAPLEY RETAIL GROUP</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-04-30T14:50:00" />
        <text id="20090430511368c626a6431ea0000567">
          <timeStamp time="2009-04-30T14:50:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:50): </by> My question is to the Attorney-General. Does the Attorney-General agree with the decision of Mr Ken MacPherson, as Acting Ombudsman, to release correspondence between the Department of Health and the Chapley Retail Group and, if so, does he support the Department of Health's appeal against that decision lodged in the District Court this week?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elder</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2009-04-30">
            <name>CHAPLEY RETAIL GROUP</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2009-04-30T14:50:00" />
        <text id="20090430511368c626a6431ea0000568">
          <timeStamp time="2009-04-30T14:50:00" />
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON (Elder—Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Energy) (14:50):</by>  Can I repeat the answers that have been given? If I understand it correctly, what has been alleged is that there is now a matter of appeal in the District Court. Can I therefore offer my considered legal opinion that, regardless of the Attorney's opinion, I think the District Court judge will probably prefer his or her own.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>