<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2009-04-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-First Parliament, Third Session (51-3)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>51</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>3</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2445" />
  <endPage num="2515" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000775">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Criminon</name>
      <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000776">
        <heading>CRIMINON</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2009-04-29T16:06:00" />
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000777">
          <timeStamp time="2009-04-29T16:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Leader of the Opposition) (16:06):</by>  I seek leave to make a personal explanation.</text>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000778">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="2497" />
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000779">
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH:</by>  Earlier this week the opposition received documents purporting to be emails between senior Labor Party identities, Mr Nick Bolkus, Mr Michael Brown and Mr John Boag, which mentioned fundraising activities involving government ministers and a Church of Scientology entity known as Applied Scholastics. This correspondence was the subject of questions put to the government during question time yesterday because only those with access to ALP fundraising records and internet emails would be in a position to verify the information.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000780">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker, this is the opportunity for a personal explanation, not to enter into debate about who can explain emails and who cannot. If the Leader of the Opposition claims to have been wronged he can explain that, but he cannot enter into debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="530">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000781">
          <by role="member" id="530">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  I uphold the point of order and remind the leader that it is factual details only, and no explanation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000782">
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH:</by>  I am explaining to the house what has occurred.</text>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000783">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="9">The Hon. P.F. Conlon interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000784">
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH:</by>  Do you want to hear the explanation or not?</text>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000785">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="9">The Hon. P.F. Conlon interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000786">
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH:</by>  Since yesterday I note the following developments: firstly, comments made publicly this morning by Mr Michael Brown, claiming that the tax invoices upon which yesterday's question was based were not original.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="526">
        <name>The Hon. P.F. CONLON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000787">
          <by role="member" id="526">The Hon. P.F. CONLON:</by>  I rise on a point of order. The leader is now entering into debate about Michael Brown claiming tax invoices. He needs to talk about where he has been factually misrepresented and make a statement, not re-debate the matter.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="530">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000788">
          <by role="member" id="530">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  The leader has to be very precise.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631">
        <name>Mr HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000789">
          <by role="member" id="631">Mr HAMILTON-SMITH:</by>  Mr Brown stated that the ALP had not received funds or donations from Applied Scholastics. Secondly, the Minister for Infrastructure has made a statement to the house on behalf of the government stating that the tax invoices were not genuine and that Mr Bolkus and Mr Brown had no knowledge of the emails dated 17 March and 6 March which formed the basis of questioning yesterday.</text>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000790">Thirdly, my office has communicated today with Ms Vicki Dunstan of the Church of Scientology Australia, who has indicated, in response to the opposition's questions, that no gifts or grants have been provided to any political party or member by the church or any representative of the church. These statements are an assurance which I accept at face value have answered questions and clarified the facts.</text>
        <text id="200904293c00432eac0f429b90000791">In light of this information I am of the view that the invoices received by the opposition and the associated emails are discredited and cannot be relied upon. I thank the government for clarifying the matter and I apologise to the house for the line of questioning and associated statements that may have incorrectly asserted that the Premier or ALP officials Nick Bolkus and Michael Brown had any formal links with the subject donations. I extend that apology to the Premier, Mr Bolkus, Mr Brown, Mr Boag and any other party who may have been offended.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>